Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28458726›Full record

ArticleCellular and molecular bioengineering2016

Effect of M1-M2 Polarization on the Motility and Traction Stresses of Primary Human Macrophages.

Laurel E Hind, Emily B Lurier, Micah Dembo, Kara L Spiller, Daniel A Hammer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cellular and molecular bioengineering, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Characteristics of macrophage aggregates prepared by rotation culture and their response to polymeric materials.Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Laurel E HindDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Emily B LurierSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Science, and Health Systems, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA.
Micah DemboDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA.
Kara L SpillerSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Science, and Health Systems, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA.
Daniel A HammerDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.

Funding

VASCULAR RELATIONS OF BLOOD CELLS AND PROTEINSP01HL018208 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI WAUGH, RICHARD E · 1985 to 2014
$24.7M
RESEARCH TRAINING IN HEMATOLOGYT32HL007899 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Jane Ellen Churpek · 1998 to 2026
$8.2M
Using micropost arrays to measure traction forces during dendritic cell motilityR01GM104287 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI HAMMER, DANIEL A · 2013 to 2016
$1.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL018208NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007899NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM104287
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Macrophages become polarized by cues in their environment and this polarization causes a functional change in their behavior. Two main subsets of polarized macrophages have been described. M1, or "classically activated" macrophages, are pro-inflammatory and M2, or "alternatively activated" macrophages, are anti-inflammatory. In this study, we investigated the motility and force generation of primary human macrophages polarized down the M1 and M2 pathways using chemokinesis assays and traction force microscopy on polyacrylamide gels. We found that M1 macrophages are significantly less motile and M2 macrophages are significantly more motile than unactivated M0 macrophages. We also showed that M1 macrophages generate significantly less force than M0 or M2 macrophages. We further found that M0 and M2, but not M1, macrophage force generation is dependent on ROCK signaling, as identified using the chemical inhibitor Y27632. Finally, using the chemical inhibitor blebbistatin, we found that myosin contraction is required for force generation by M0, M1, and M2 macrophages. This study represents the first investigation of the changes in the mechanical motility mechanisms used by macrophages after polarization.

Indexed as

chemokinesismechanotransductiontraction force microscopy

Identifiers

PMID28458726
PMCPMC5404741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.