Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28458610›Full record

ArticleCurrent opinion in solid state & materials science2016

Integrating Concepts of Material Mechanics, Ligand Chemistry, Dimensionality and Degradation to Control Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells.

Matthew G Haugh, Sarah C Heilshorn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current opinion in solid state & materials science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Matthew G HaughDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Sarah C HeilshornDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

Funding

Stanford/UNC Biomimetic U19 Research CenterU19AI116484 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GREENBERG, HARRY BERNARD · 2015 to 2025
$13.5M
Injectable Hydrogels to Improve the Efficacy of iPSC-derived TherapiesR21EB020235 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HEILSHORN, SARAH C, HUANG, NGAN F. · 2015 to 2016
$433k
Engineered Intestinal Microenvironments as Preclinical Drug Screening PlatformsR21EB018407 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HEILSHORN, SARAH C · 2014 to 2015
$427k
NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI116484NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB018407NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB020235
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of substrate mechanics in guiding mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) fate has been the focus of much research over the last decade. More recently, the complex interplay between substrate mechanics and other material properties such as ligand chemistry and substrate degradability to regulate MSC differentiation has begun to be elucidated. Additionally, there are several changes in the presentation of these material properties as the dimensionality is altered from two- to three-dimensional substrates, which may fundamentally alter our understanding of substrate-induced mechanotransduction processes. In this review, an overview of recent findings that highlight the material properties that are important in guiding MSC fate decisions is presented, with a focus on underlining gaps in our existing knowledge and proposing potential directions for future research.

Indexed as

3D CultureMechanotransductionStem Cell DifferentiationSubstrate StiffnessTissue Engineering

Identifiers

PMID28458610
PMCPMC5404745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.