Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28458595›Full record

ReviewKorean journal of radiology

Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI: 2016 Consensus Recommendations of the Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology.

Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology

Abstract readReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Review in Korean journal of radiology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2024
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Introducing "Recommendation and Guideline" of theKorean journal of radiology · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. The Optimal Management for Sub-Centimeter Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Curative Treatments or Follow-Up?Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) poses certain unique challenges beyond the scope of current guidelines. The regional heterogeneity of HCC in demographic characteristics, prevalence, surveillance, and socioeconomic status necessitates different treatment approaches, leading to variations in survival outcomes. Considering the medical practices in Korea, the Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology (KSAR) study group for liver diseases has developed expert consensus recommendations for diagnosis of HCC by gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI with updated perspectives, using a modified Delphi method. During the 39th Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting of KSAR (2016), consensus was reached on 12 of 16 statements. These recommendations might serve to ensure a more standardized diagnosis of HCC by gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularContrast MediaGadolinium DTPAHumansLiver NeoplasmsMagnetic Resonance ImagingRadiography, AbdominalRepublic of KoreaSensitivity and SpecificitySocieties, ScientificTomography, X-Ray ComputedContrast MediaGadolinium DTPAgadolinium ethoxybenzyl DTPAConsensusGadoxetic acidGuidelinesHepatocellular carcinomaLiverMagnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID28458595
PMCPMC5390612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.