Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28458563›Full record

ArticleOncoTargets and therapy2017

Impact of platelet to lymphocyte ratio and metabolic syndrome on the prognosis of colorectal cancer patients.

Jie You, Huxiang Zhang, Yanyan Shen, Chuanzhi Chen, Wenyue Liu, Minghua Zheng, Sven Van Poucke, Guilong Guo, Zonghai Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in OncoTargets and therapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jie YouDepartment of General Surgery, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou.
Huxiang ZhangDepartment of Pathology.
Yanyan ShenDepartment of Oncological Surgery.
Chuanzhi ChenDepartment of Oncological Surgery.
Wenyue LiuDepartment of Endocrinology.
Minghua ZhengDepartment of Hepatology, Liver Research Center, the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, People's Republic of China.
Sven Van PouckeDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine and Pain Therapy, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium.
Guilong GuoDepartment of Oncological Surgery.
Zonghai HuangDepartment of General Surgery, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of both platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and metabolic syndrome (MetS) in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe retrospectively enrolled 1,163 CRC patients. Preoperative values of PLR were stratified into three groups according to cut-off values of 120 and 220. The Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to calculate cumulative survival rate related to PLR and MetS. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to analyze potential risk factors and the prognosis associated with PLR and MetS in CRC patients.

resultsPLR was significantly higher in the MetS(+) group as compared to MetS(-) group (

conclusionPreoperative PLR was associated with MetS in CRC patients. Testing for the combined presence of PLR and MetS could potentially improve the predictive accuracy of CRC prognosis.

Indexed as

colorectal cancermetabolic syndromeplatelet to lymphocyte ratioprognosis

Identifiers

PMID28458563
PMCPMC5403005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.