Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28458534›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2017

Home monitoring of breathing rate in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: observational study of feasibility, acceptability, and change after exacerbation.

Noah Rubio, Richard A Parker, Ellen M Drost, Hilary Pinnock, Christopher J Weir, Janet Hanley, Leandro C Mantoani, William MacNee, Brian McKinstry, Roberto A Rabinovich

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyObservational StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. [Quantitative analysis of breathing patterns based on wearable systems].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Noah RubioEdinburgh Lung and the Environment Group Initiative (ELEGI) Colt Laboratory, Centre for Inflammation Research.
Richard A ParkerEdinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, The University of Edinburgh.
Ellen M DrostEdinburgh Lung and the Environment Group Initiative (ELEGI) Colt Laboratory, Centre for Inflammation Research.
Hilary PinnockAllergy and Respiratory Research Group, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, The University of Edinburgh, Medical School, Teviot Place.
Christopher J WeirEdinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, The University of Edinburgh.
Janet HanleySchool of Health and Social Care, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, Lothian, UK.
Leandro C MantoaniEdinburgh Lung and the Environment Group Initiative (ELEGI) Colt Laboratory, Centre for Inflammation Research.
William MacNeeEdinburgh Lung and the Environment Group Initiative (ELEGI) Colt Laboratory, Centre for Inflammation Research.
Brian McKinstryEdinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, The University of Edinburgh.
Roberto A RabinovichEdinburgh Lung and the Environment Group Initiative (ELEGI) Colt Laboratory, Centre for Inflammation Research.
Centre for Inflammation Research · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GBCentre for Global Health Research · CAEdinburgh Napier University · GB

Funding

Chief Scientist Office ARPG/07/03Chief Scientist Office CZH/4/826
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Telehealth programs to promote early identification and timely self-management of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (AECOPDs) have yielded disappointing results, in part, because parameters monitored (symptoms, pulse oximetry, and spirometry) are weak predictors of exacerbations. PURPOSE: Breathing rate (BR) rises during AECOPD and may be a promising predictor. Devices suitable for home use to measure BR have recently become available, but their accuracy, acceptability, and ability to detect changes in people with COPD is not known. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe compared five BR monitors, which used different monitoring technologies, with a gold standard (Oxycon Mobile

resultsWhile two monitors demonstrated acceptable accuracy compared with the gold standard, some participants found them intrusive particularly when ill with an exacerbation, limiting their potential utility in acute situations. A reduction in resting BR during the recovery from an AECOPD was observed in some, but not in all participants and there was considerable day-to-day individual variation.

conclusionResting BR shows some promise in identifying exacerbations; however, further prospective study to assess this is required.

Indexed as

Respiratory MechanicsAgedAged, 80 and overDisease ProgressionEquipment DesignExerciseFeasibility StudiesFemaleHeart RateHumansInterviews as TopicLungMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionPredictive Value of TestsCOPD exacerbationCOPD managementheart ratetelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID28458534
PMCPMC5404493
OpenAlexW2599715548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.