Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28457905›Full record

ArticleExperimental neurology2017

Refining environmental enrichment to advance rehabilitation based research after experimental traumatic brain injury.

Hannah L Radabaugh, Megan J LaPorte, Anna M Greene, Corina O Bondi, Naima Lajud, Anthony E Kline

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental neurology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Increasing Rigor of Preclinical Research to Maximize Opportunities for Translation.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2023
    Review
  7. Enriched environment as a nonpharmacological neuroprotective strategy.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hannah L RadabaughPhysical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.
Megan J LaPortePhysical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.
Anna M GreenePhysical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.
Corina O BondiPhysical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.
Naima LajudPhysical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; División de Neurociencias, Centro de Investigación Biomédica de Michoacán - Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social Morelia, Mexico.
Anthony E KlinePhysical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States. Electronic address: klineae@upmc.edu.
University of Pittsburgh · USCenter for the Neural Basis of Cognition · US

Funding

Optimizing Environmental Enrichment to Model Preclinical NeurorehabilitationR01NS084967 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KLINE, ANTHONY E. · 2014 to 2025
$3.7M
Environmental Enrichment and Cholinergic Mechanisms after TBIR01NS060005 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KLINE, ANTHONY E. · 2009 to 2013
$1.6M
Understanding the Impact of Antipsychotic Drugs on Recovery After TBIR01HD069620 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KLINE, ANTHONY E. · 2012 to 2016
$1.6M
Multimodal Assessment of Behavioral flexibility after Frontal Brain TraumaR21NS099683 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BONDI, CORINA OANA · 2016 to 2017
$426k
Sustained Attention and Executive Functioning After Brain TraumaR03NS094950 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BONDI, CORINA OANA · 2016 to 2017
$154k
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD069620NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS060005NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS084967NINDS NIH HHS R03 NS094950NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS099683
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The typical environmental enrichment (EE) paradigm, which consists of continuous exposure after experimental traumatic brain injury (TBI), promotes behavioral and histological benefits. However, rehabilitation is often abbreviated in the clinic and administered in multiple daily sessions. While recent studies have demonstrated that a once daily 6-hr bout of EE confers benefits comparable to continuous EE, breaking the therapy into two shorter sessions may increase novelty and ultimately enhance recovery. Hence, the aim of the study was to test the hypothesis that functional and histological outcomes will be significantly improved by daily preclinical neurorehabilitation consisting of two 3-hr periods of EE vs. a single 6-hr session. Anesthetized adult male rats received a controlled cortical impact of moderate-to-severe injury (2.8mm tissue deformation at 4m/s) or sham surgery and were then randomly assigned to groups receiving standard (STD) housing, a single 6-hr session of EE, or two 3-hr sessions of EE daily for 3weeks. Motor function (beam-balance/traversal) and acquisition of spatial learning/memory retention (Morris water maze) were assessed on post-operative days 1-5 and 14-19, respectively. Cortical lesion volume was quantified on day 21. Both EE conditions improved motor function and acquisition of spatial learning, and reduced cortical lesion volume relative to STD housing (p<0.05), but did not differ from one another in any endpoint (p>0.05). The findings replicate previous work showing that 6-hr of EE daily is sufficient to confer behavioral and histological benefits after TBI and extend the findings by demonstrating that the benefits are comparable regardless of how the 6-hrs of EE are accrued. The relevance of the finding is that it can be extrapolated to the clinic and may benefit patients who cannot endure a single extended period of neurorehabilitation.

Indexed as

EnvironmentAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsBrain Injuries, TraumaticDisease Models, AnimalMaleNeurologic ExaminationPsychomotor PerformanceRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyRecovery of FunctionRetention, PsychologySpatial LearningTime FactorsBehavioral outcomeControlled cortical impactEnvironmental enrichmentFunctional recoveryLearning and memoryMorris water mazeTraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID28457905
PMCPMC5510462
OpenAlexW2607738725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.