Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28457232›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2017

The evolution of CHROMOMETHYLASES and gene body DNA methylation in plants.

Adam J Bewick, Chad E Niederhuth, Lexiang Ji, Nicholas A Rohr, Patrick T Griffin, Jim Leebens-Mack, Robert J Schmitz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 89 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
89citing papers in PubMed
32.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

89 citing papers in PubMed, 180 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Harnessing neo-domestication of wild pigmented rice for enhanced nutrition and sustainable agriculture.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Adam J BewickDepartment of Genetics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA.
Chad E NiederhuthDepartment of Genetics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA.
Lexiang JiInstitute of Bioinformatics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA.
Nicholas A RohrDepartment of Genetics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA.
Patrick T GriffinDepartment of Genetics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA.
Jim Leebens-MackDepartment of Plant Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA.
Robert J SchmitzDepartment of Genetics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA. schmitz@uga.edu.
University of Georgia · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe evolution of gene body methylation (gbM), its origins, and its functional consequences are poorly understood. By pairing the largest collection of transcriptomes (>1000) and methylomes (77) across Viridiplantae, we provide novel insights into the evolution of gbM and its relationship to CHROMOMETHYLASE (CMT) proteins.

resultsCMTs are evolutionary conserved DNA methyltransferases in Viridiplantae. Duplication events gave rise to what are now referred to as CMT1, 2 and 3. Independent losses of CMT1, 2, and 3 in eudicots, CMT2 and ZMET in monocots and monocots/commelinids, variation in copy number, and non-neutral evolution suggests overlapping or fluid functional evolution of this gene family. DNA methylation within genes is widespread and is found in all major taxonomic groups of Viridiplantae investigated. Genes enriched with methylated CGs (mCG) were also identified in species sister to angiosperms. The proportion of genes and DNA methylation patterns associated with gbM are restricted to angiosperms with a functional CMT3 or ortholog. However, mCG-enriched genes in the gymnosperm Pinus taeda shared some similarities with gbM genes in Amborella trichopoda. Additionally, gymnosperms and ferns share a CMT homolog closely related to CMT2 and 3. Hence, the dependency of gbM on a CMT most likely extends to all angiosperms and possibly gymnosperms and ferns.

conclusionsThe resulting gene family phylogeny of CMT transcripts from the most diverse sampling of plants to date redefines our understanding of CMT evolution and its evolutionary consequences on DNA methylation. Future, functional tests of homologous and paralogous CMTs will uncover novel roles and consequences to the epigenome.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationEvolution, MolecularDNA (Cytosine-5-)-MethyltransferasesPhylogenyPlant ProteinsViridiplantaechromomethylaseDNA (Cytosine-5-)-MethyltransferasesPlant ProteinsCHROMOMETHYLASEDNA methylationPhylogeneticsWGBSWhole-genome bisulfite sequencing

Identifiers

PMID28457232
PMCPMC5410703
OpenAlexW2952286808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.