Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28456861›Full record

ArticleThe journal of primary prevention2017

Early Impacts of Marijuana Legalization: An Evaluation of Prices in Colorado and Washington.

Priscillia Hunt, Rosalie Liccardo Pacula

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of primary prevention, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The supply-side effects of cannabis legalization.Journal of cannabis research · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Medical Cannabis for Headache Pain: a Primer for Clinicians.Current pain and headache reports · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Natural Cannabinoids as Templates for Sleep Disturbances Treatments.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Interpol review of controlled substances 2016-2019.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Priscillia HuntRAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA, 90407, USA.
Rosalie Liccardo PaculaRAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA, 90407, USA. pacula@rand.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6145-9865

Funding

Implementation of Medical Marijuana and its Impact on HealthR01DA032693 · NIDA · RAND CORPORATION · PI PACULA, ROSALIE LICCARDO · 2011 to 2014
$3.1M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA032693
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following the legalization and regulation of marijuana for recreational purposes in states with medical markets, policymakers and researchers seek empirical evidence on how, and how fast, supply and demand changed over time. Prices are an indication of how suppliers and consumers respond to policy changes, so this study uses a difference-in-difference approach to exploit the timing of policy implementation and identify the impacts on marijuana prices 4-5 months after markets opened. This study uses unique longitudinal survey data of prices paid by consumers and a web-scraped dataset of dispensary prices advertised online for three U.S. medical marijuana states that all eventually legalized recreational marijuana. Results indicate there were no impacts on the prices paid for medical or recreational marijuana by state-representative residents within the short 4- to 5-months window following legalization. However, there were differences in how much people paid if they obtained marijuana for recreational purposes from a recreational store. Further analysis of advertised prices confirms this result, but further demonstrates heterogeneous responses in prices across types of commonly advertised strains; prices either did not change or increased depending on the strain type. A key implication of our findings is that there are both supply and demand responses at work in the opening of legalized markets, suggesting that evaluations of immediate effects may not accurately reflect the long run impact of legalization on consumption.

Indexed as

ColoradoCommerceHumansLegislation, DrugLongitudinal StudiesMarijuana UseTime FactorsWashingtonAffordabilityLegalizationMarijuanaPolicy impactPrices

Identifiers

PMID28456861
PMCPMC5544434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.