Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28456844›Full record

ArticleInflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.]2017

Preclinical evaluation of the urokinase receptor-derived peptide UPARANT as an anti-inflammatory drug.

Serena Boccella, Elisabetta Panza, Liliana Lista, Carmela Belardo, Angela Ianaro, Mario De Rosa, Vito de Novellis, Vincenzo Pavone

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.], 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Turn-Adopting Peptidomimetic as a Formyl Peptide Receptor-1 Antagonist.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. UPARANT is an effective antiangiogenic agent in a mouse model of rubeosis iridis.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Serena BoccellaDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania, Naples, Italy.
Elisabetta PanzaDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Liliana ListaDepartment of Chemical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Carmela BelardoDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania, Naples, Italy.
Angela IanaroDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Mario De RosaDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania, Naples, Italy.
Vito de NovellisDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania, Naples, Italy. vito.denovellis@unicampania.it.
Vincenzo PavoneDepartment of Chemical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy. vipavone@unina.it.
University of Naples Federico II · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInflammation plays a key role in the pathogenesis of several chronic diseases. The urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) exerts a plethora of functions in both physiological and pathological processes, including inflammation. OBJECTIVE AND

designIn this study, we evaluated the anti-inflammatory effect of a novel peptide ligand of uPAR, UPARANT, in different animal models of inflammation. SUBJECTS AND TREATMENT: Rats and mice were divided in different groups (n = 5) for single or repeated administration of vehicle (9% DMSO in 0.9% NaCl), UPARANT (6, 12 and 24 mg/kg) or dexamethasone (2 mg/kg). Animals were subjected to carrageenan-induced paw oedema or zymosan-induced peritonitis.

methodsUPARANT effects were tested on: (1) the carrageenan-induced paw oedema volume, (2) the expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) and the nitrite/nitrate (NOx) levels in the paw exudates, (3) cells recruitment into the peritoneal cavity after zymosan injection and (4) NOx levels in the peritoneal lavage.

resultsUPARANT (12 and 24 mg/kg) reduced inflammation in both experimental paradigms. Analysis of pro-inflammatory enzymes revealed that administration of UPARANT reduced iNOS, COX2 and NO over-production.

conclusionsOur study provides a solid evidence that UPARANT reduces the severity of inflammation in diverse animal models, thus representing a novel anti-inflammatory drug with potential advantages with respect to the typical steroidal agents.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Inflammatory AgentsCarrageenanCyclooxygenase 2DexamethasoneEdemaMaleMiceNitratesNitric Oxide Synthase Type IINitritesOligopeptidesPeritoneal LavagePeritonitisRats, WistarZymosanacetyl-arginyl-aminoisobutyryl-arginyl-C(alpha)-methylphenylalaninamideAnti-Inflammatory AgentsCarrageenanCyclooxygenase 2DexamethasoneNitratesNitric Oxide Synthase Type IINitritesNos2 protein, ratOligopeptidesPtgs2 protein, ratZymosanInflammationUPARANTUrokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor

Identifiers

PMID28456844
OpenAlexW2607617548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.