Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28456421›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology2017

Mendelian Randomization Implicates High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol-Associated Mechanisms in Etiology of Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

Stephen Burgess, George Davey Smith

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 94 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
94citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
13.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

94 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 163 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. CETP Renaissance with Obicetrapib.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2026
    Review
  9. Mendelian Randomization in Eye Research: Powerful, but Prone to Misuse.Translational vision science & technology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Outlier Detection in Mendelian Randomization.Statistics in medicine · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

34 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stephen BurgessMRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cardiovascular Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom. Electronic address: sb452@medschl.cam.ac.uk.
George Davey SmithMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
University of Bristol · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation RG/08/014/24067Medical Research Council MC_UU_00002/7Medical Research Council MC_UU_12013/1Medical Research Council MR/L003120/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeUndertake a systematic investigation into associations between genetic predictors of lipid fractions and age-related macular degeneration (AMD) risk.

designTwo-sample Mendelian randomization investigation using published data.

participantsA total of 33 526 individuals (16 144 cases, 17 832 controls) predominantly of European ancestry from the International Age-related Macular Degeneration Genomics Consortium.

methodsWe consider 185 variants previously demonstrated to be associated with at least 1 of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, or triglycerides at a genome-wide level of significance, and test their associations with AMD. We particularly focus on variants in gene regions that are proxies for specific pharmacologic agents for lipid therapy. We then conduct a 2-sample Mendelian randomization investigation to assess the causal roles of LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, and triglycerides on AMD risk. We also conduct parallel investigations for coronary artery disease (CAD) (viewed as a positive control) and Alzheimer's disease (a negative control) for comparison.

main outcome measuresDiagnosis of AMD.

resultsWe find evidence that HDL-cholesterol is a causal risk factor for AMD, with an odds ratio (OR) estimate of 1.22 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.44) per 1 standard deviation increase in HDL-cholesterol. No causal effect of LDL-cholesterol or triglycerides was found. Variants in the CETP gene region associated with increased circulating HDL-cholesterol also associate with increased AMD risk, although variants in the LIPC gene region that increase circulating HDL-cholesterol have the opposite direction of association with AMD risk. Parallel analyses suggest that lipids have a greater role for AMD compared with Alzheimer's disease, but a lesser role than for CAD.

conclusionsSome genetic evidence suggests that HDL-cholesterol is a causal risk factor for AMD risk and that increasing HDL-cholesterol (particularly via CETP inhibition) will increase AMD risk.

Indexed as

Mendelian Randomization AnalysisAgedCholesterol Ester Transfer ProteinsCholesterol, HDLCholesterol, LDLFemaleGenetic Association StudiesGenetic VariationGenotypeHumansMacular DegenerationMaleMiddle AgedOdds RatioPolymorphism, Single NucleotideRisk FactorsCETP protein, humanCholesterol Ester Transfer ProteinsCholesterol, HDLCholesterol, LDLTriglycerides

Identifiers

PMID28456421
PMCPMC5526457
OpenAlexW2609016849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.