Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28455755›Full record

ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2017

Is early embryo development as observed by time-lapse microscopy dependent on whether fresh or frozen sperm was used for ICSI? A cohort study.

Jessica Eastick, Christos Venetis, Simon Cooke, Ashleigh Storr, Daisy Susetio, Michael Chapman

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jessica EastickHunter IVF, IVF Australia, PO Box 417, New Lambton, New South Wales, 2305, Australia. Jessica.eastick@hunterivf.com.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6342-4108
Christos VenetisHunter IVF, IVF Australia, PO Box 417, New Lambton, New South Wales, 2305, Australia.
Simon CookeHunter IVF, IVF Australia, PO Box 417, New Lambton, New South Wales, 2305, Australia.
Ashleigh StorrHunter IVF, IVF Australia, PO Box 417, New Lambton, New South Wales, 2305, Australia.
Daisy SusetioHunter IVF, IVF Australia, PO Box 417, New Lambton, New South Wales, 2305, Australia.
Michael ChapmanHunter IVF, IVF Australia, PO Box 417, New Lambton, New South Wales, 2305, Australia.
UNSW Sydney · AUHunter Water · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to compare timings of key events of embryo development from those originating from either fresh or cryopreserved ejaculate sperm using time-lapse technology.

methodsIn this retrospective observational cohort study, time-lapse technology was used to monitor 1927 embryos from 234 women undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and utilizing either fresh (n = 172 cycles) or cryopreserved ejaculate sperm (n = 62 cycles) for insemination were included in the study. Key developmental events as described in time-lapse were compared with the use of generalized estimating equations (GEE) to adjust for any auto-correlation between the observations. In addition, multivariable logit regression models were used to account for any known baseline differences between the two groups.

resultsThere were no differences in conventional embryo development such as number of 8-cell embryos by 72 h (p = 0.359), the number of blastocysts by 120 h (p = 0.417), and the number of top quality blastocysts (p = 0.956) between the two groups compared. There were no statistical differences in the timings of any of the key embryo developmental events (PN_t1, NEBD, cytokinesis, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, tM, tSB, tEB, tHB, s1, s2, s3, cc2, and cc3) when either fresh or cryopreserved ejaculate sperm was used for ICSI. This was also confirmed with conventional morphological assessment.

conclusionsThis observational cohort study has shown that there are no differences in the morphokinetic parameters of early embryo development when either fresh or frozen ejaculate sperm are used for ICSI insemination.

Indexed as

Embryo Culture TechniquesAdultBlastocystCryopreservationEmbryonic DevelopmentEmbryo TransferFemaleFertilization in VitroHumansMaleMicroscopyPregnancyPregnancy RateSpermatozoaSperm Injections, IntracytoplasmicTime-Lapse ImagingEmbryo developmentICSIMorphokineticSemen cryopreservationTime-lapse

Identifiers

PMID28455755
PMCPMC5445057
OpenAlexW2608308751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.