Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28455689›Full record

ArticleProbiotics and antimicrobial proteins2018

Aggregation and Adhesion Activity of Lactobacilli Isolated from Fermented Products In Vitro and In Vivo: a Potential Probiotic Strain.

S Grigoryan, I Bazukyan, A Trchounian

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Unraveling the antimicrobial potential ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A novel probiotic strain ofCurrent research in microbial sciences · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S GrigoryanDepartment of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology, Yerevan State University, 1 Alex ManoogianSstr, 0025, Yerevan, Armenia.
I BazukyanDepartment of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology, Yerevan State University, 1 Alex ManoogianSstr, 0025, Yerevan, Armenia.
A TrchounianDepartment of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology, Yerevan State University, 1 Alex ManoogianSstr, 0025, Yerevan, Armenia. Trchounian@ysu.am.
Yerevan State University · AM

Funding

State Committee of Science Basic support
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Approximately 25 strains of lactobacilli isolated from different dairy products and fermented vegetables were screened according to their possibility to show the high auto-aggregation and co-aggregation. The strains Lactobacillus helveticus INRA-2010-H11, Lactobacillus rhamnosus INA-5.1, and Lactobacillus acidophilus JM-2012 were determined to have the high auto-aggregation (approximately 73, 46, and 70.5% correspondingly). A high co-aggregation capacity (75.53%) for strains INRA-2010-H11 and JM-2012 was shown. The adhesion degree of INRA-2010-H11 on the surface of buccal epithelial cells was 88.23%. The study of INRA-2010-H11, JM-2012, and both strains' mixture (1:1) adhesion capacity on the surface of epithelial HeLa cells revealed the adhesion of 1.1 × 10

Indexed as

Bacterial AdhesionAdolescentAdultAnimalsBiodiversityCheekDairy ProductsEpithelial CellsFecesFemaleFermented FoodsGastrointestinal MicrobiomeGastrointestinal TractHeLa CellsHumansLactobacillusAdhesionAggregationDiversityEpithelial cell modelsLactic acid bacteria

Identifiers

PMID28455689
OpenAlexW2607727104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.