Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28455633›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2017

Evaluation of left ventricular myocardial mechanics by three-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography in the patients with different graded coronary artery stenosis.

Lin Li, Ping-Yang Zhang, Hong Ran, Jing Dong, Ling-Ling Fang, Qian-Shan Ding

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Comparison of two ellipsoidal models for the estimation of left ventricular end-systolic stress in patients with significant coronary artery disease.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lin LiDepartment of Echocardiography, Nanjing First Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, 68 Changle Road, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Ping-Yang ZhangDepartment of Echocardiography, Nanjing First Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, 68 Changle Road, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China. zhpy28@hotmail.com.
Hong RanDepartment of Echocardiography, Nanjing First Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, 68 Changle Road, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Jing DongDepartment of Echocardiography, Nanjing First Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, 68 Changle Road, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Ling-Ling FangDepartment of Echocardiography, Nanjing First Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, 68 Changle Road, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Qian-Shan DingDepartment of Echocardiography, Nanjing First Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, 68 Changle Road, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To investigate the relationship between left ventricular (LV) myocardial mechanics evaluated by three-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography (3D-STE) and degree of coronary artery stenosis in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Ninety-seven suspected CAD patients without LV regional wall motion abnormality (RWMA) observed visually form traditional echocardiography were divided into four groups according to coronary artery angiography (CAG): 23 patients in slight stenosis group [stenosis rate (SR) ≤25%], 26 patients in mild stenosis group (25< SR ≤50%), 28 patients in moderate stenosis group (50< SR ≤75%), and 20 patients in severe stenosis group (SR >75%). Global longitudinal strain (GLS), circumferential strain (GCS), radial strain (GRS), area strain (AS) and three dimensional strain (3D-Strain) were obtained. The parameters from 3D-STE were compared between different groups and then the diagnostic value of global strains indicating different graded coronary artery stenosis was analyzed by the receiver operating characteristic curve. (1) There were significant difference in GLS, GCS, GRS, GAS and 3D-Strain between the severe stenosis group and any other group while all 3D-STE parameters except GCS in the moderate stenosis group were remarkably different from those respectively in mild group. (2) Receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC) analysis showed that the area under the curve of GLS, GRS, GCS, GAS, 3D-Strain were 0.899, 0.873, 0.723, 0.856 and 0.863 respectively for the identification of stenosis rate >50%, and 0.896, 0.866, 0.797, 0.909 and 0.899 respectively for the identification of severe stenosis. GAS less than -29.13% allowed a sensitivity of 95% and a specificity of 71.4%, while 3D strain less than 41.35% allowed a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 80.5% for evaluating serve coronary artery stenosis. The myocardial mechanics from 3D-STE in the CAD patients were characteristic. It could be expected to identify serve coronary stenosis with a good sensitivity and an acceptable specificity by using GAS or 3D-strain especially in the suspected CAD patients without RWMA on conventional echocardiography.

Indexed as

Myocardial ContractionVentricular Function, LeftArea Under CurveBiomechanical PhenomenaCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary StenosisEchocardiography, Three-DimensionalFemaleHeart VentriclesHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedObserver VariationPredictive Value of TestsCoronary artery diseaseEchocardiographySpeckle trackingStenosisStrain

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.