Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28455370›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2017

Decorrelated Input Dissociates Narrow Band γ Power and BOLD in Human Visual Cortex.

Russell Butler, Pierre-Michel Bernier, Jérémie Lefebvre, Guillaume Gilbert, Kevin Whittingstall

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Russell ButlerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Radiobiology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science.ORCID 0000-0001-5089-0185
Pierre-Michel BernierDepartment of Kinanthropology, and.
Jérémie LefebvreKrembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario M5T 2S8, Canada.
Guillaume GilbertMR Clinical Science, Philips Healthcare Canada, Markham, Ontario L6C 2S3, Canada.
Kevin WhittingstallDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Radiobiology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, kevin.whittingstall@usherbrooke.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-9352-3438
CARE Canada · CAInstitut de Radiobiologie Cellulaire et Moléculaire · FRUniversité de Sherbrooke · CAUniversity Health Network · CAWinthrop University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although fMRI using the BOLD contrast is widely used for noninvasively mapping hemodynamic brain activity in humans, its exact link to underlying neural processing is poorly understood. Whereas some studies have reported that BOLD signals measured in visual cortex are tightly linked to neural activity in the narrow band γ (NBG) range, others have found a weak correlation between the two. To elucidate the mechanisms behind these conflicting findings, we hypothesized that BOLD reflects the strength of synaptic inputs to cortex, whereas NBG is more dependent on how well these inputs are correlated. To test this, we measured NBG, BOLD, and cerebral blood flow responses to stimuli that either correlate or decorrelate neural activity in human visual cortex. Next, we simulated a recurrent network model of excitatory and inhibitory neurons that reproduced in detail the experimental NBG and BOLD data. Results show that the visually evoked BOLD response was solely predicted by the sum of local inputs, whereas NBG was critically dependent on how well these inputs were correlated. In summary, the NBG-BOLD relationship strongly depends on the nature of sensory input to cortex: stimuli that increase the number of correlated inputs to visual cortex will increase NBG and BOLD in a similar manner, whereas stimuli that increase the number of decorrelated inputs will dissociate the two. The NBG-BOLD relationship is therefore not fixed but is rather highly dependent on input correlations that are both stimulus- and state-dependent.

Indexed as

Blood Flow VelocityBrain MappingCerebrovascular CirculationCortical SynchronizationEvoked Potentials, VisualFemaleGamma RhythmHumansMaleNerve NetOxygen ConsumptionReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityVisual CortexVisual PerceptionYoung AdultCBFEEGfMRIsynaptic input

Identifiers

PMID28455370
PMCPMC6596528
OpenAlexW2609102962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.