Trial reportStroke2017
Nonprocedural Symptomatic Infarction and In-Stent Restenosis After Intracranial Angioplasty and Stenting in the SAMMPRIS Trial (Stenting and Aggressive Medical Management for the Prevention of Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis).
Trial report in Stroke, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00576693 (Stenting vs. Aggressive Medical Management for Preventing Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 46 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Stenting vs. Aggressive Medical Management for Preventing Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.
- Drug-eluting stent versus bare metal stent for symptomatic intracranial stenosis: a comparative systematic review and meta-analysis study.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- Drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents for intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ open · 2024Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in symptomatic intracranial and vertebral artery stenosis: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Pooled it
- Drug-coated Balloons in the Neurovascular Setting: A Comprehensive, Systematic Review of Current Use and Indications.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Intracranial Angioplasty with Enterprise Stent for Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis: A Single-Center Experience and a Systematic Review.BioMed research international · 2021Pooled it
- Incidence and Risk Factors of In-Stent Restenosis for Symptomatic Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2020Pooled it
- Comparison of Drug-Eluting Stent With Bare-Metal Stent in Patients With Symptomatic High-grade Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA neurology · 2022Trial
- Predictive Value of Baseline High-Resolution MRI Features for In-Stent Restenosis in Symptomatic Nonacute Intracranial Atherosclerotic Occlusion.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026Article
- Territorial Stroke in SAMMPRIS: Critical Analyses of Stroke Prevention in Intracranial Atherosclerosis.Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Nanoparticle-based antioxidants suppress angioplasty-induced neointimal hyperplasia in rat carotid arteries.Journal of clinical biochemistry and nutrition · 2026Article
- Endovascular Therapy for Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis: Evidence and Controversies.Journal of neuroendovascular therapy · 2026Review
- Dedicated drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents for vertebral artery origin stenosis: a real-world single-center experience.BMC neurology · 2025Observational
- Higher Time to Peak after Stent Implantation in Symptomatic High-Grade Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis is Related to In-Stent Restenosis.Translational stroke research · 2025Article
- Protective Factors of Postendovascular Therapy Restenosis for Symptomatic Intracranial Arterial Stenosis: A Retrospective Analysis.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2025Article
- Optical coherence tomography evaluation of vessel wall microstructure before and after endovascular stent treatment for intracranial vertebrobasilar atherosclerotic stenosis.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Risk factors of restenosis after paclitaxel-coated balloon treatment in symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Comparison of safety and efficacy of different endovascular treatments for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: results from a single center.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Predictive Utility of PLR and Platelet-to-LDL Ratio for in-Stent Restenosis Following Carotid Artery Stenting.Vascular health and risk management · 2025Article
- Drug-coated balloon angioplasty versus conventional angioplasty for symptomatic non-acute intracranial artery occlusion.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Self-expanding intracranial drug-eluting stent system in patients with symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: initial experience and midterm angiographic follow-up.Neuroradiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
background and purposeThe purpose of this study was to investigate the frequency of symptomatic in-stent restenosis (ISR) and its contribution to nonprocedural symptomatic infarction in the SAMMPRIS trial (Stenting and Aggressive Medical Management for the Prevention of Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis).
methodsPatients without a periprocedural primary end point were followed up to determine the occurrence of any of the following events: ischemic stroke, cerebral infarct with temporary signs, or transient ischemic attack in the territory of the stented artery. Vascular imaging performed after these events was reviewed for ISR. Annual rates for symptomatic ISR were calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates.
resultsOf 183 patients in the stenting group without a periprocedural primary end point, 27 (14.8%) had a symptomatic infarction (stroke or cerebral infarct with temporary signs) and 16 (8.7%) had transient ischemic attack alone in the territory during a median follow-up of 35.0 months. Of the 27 patients with infarctions, 17 (9.3%) had an ischemic stroke and 10 (5.5%) had a cerebral infarct with temporary signs alone. Adequate vascular imaging to evaluate ISR was available in 24 patients with infarctions (showing ISR in 16 [66.7%]) and in 10 patients with transient ischemic attack alone (showing ISR in 8 [80%]). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year rates (with 95% confidence limits) for symptomatic ISR in the SAMMPRIS stent cohort were 9.6% (6.1%-14.9%), 11.3% (7.5%-17.0%), and 14.0% (9.6%-20.2%), respectively.
conclusionsSymptomatic ISR occurred in at least 1 of 7 patients in SAMMPRIS by 3 years of follow-up and was likely responsible for the majority of nonprocedural cerebral infarctions. CLINICAL
trial registrationURL: https://clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00576693.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.