ArticlePreventive medicine2017
A longitudinal assessment of adherence to breast and cervical cancer screening recommendations among women with and without intellectual disability.
Article in Preventive medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- A literature review of cancer diagnostic tests and treatments in adults with intellectual disability.HRB open research · 2025Pooled it
- Disparities in Cervical Cancer Screening by Disability Types: a Systematic Review.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023Pooled it
- Factors promoting breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screenings participation: A systematic review.Psycho-oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Disability and Participation in Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Pooled it
- Inequities in Preventive Care for Adults with Intellectual and/or Developmental Disability in the USA: A Narrative Review.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Review
- Cancer screening in people with intellectual disability: a scoping review of participation, barriers, facilitators, and improvement strategies within the EUCanScreen initiative.International journal for equity in health · 2026Article
- Individual-Level Trends in Mammography Screening over 14 years: Results from an All-Payer Statewide Claims Database.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2026Article
- Investigating Cancer literacy and help-seeking barriers among individuals with intellectual disabilities in Hungary.Preventive medicine reports · 2026Article
- Preventive breast health care, an embarrassing subject for women with intellectual disability.Journal of intellectual disabilities : JOID · 2026Article
- Cancer prevalence and care disparities among individuals with intellectual disabilities: a cross-sectional pan-cancer analysis.ESMO real world data and digital oncology · 2025Article
- A Systematic Review to Evaluate the Barriers to Breast Cancer Screening in Women with Disability.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- [Cancer in people with an intellectual disability in Germany: prevalence, genetics, and care situation].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2024Review
- Disparities in Breast Cancer Screening Rates Among Adults With and Without Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.Annals of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- Principles for Service Delivery: Best Practices for Cervical Screening for Women with Disabilities.International journal of women's health · 2024Review
- An Adapted Cancer Screening Education Program for Native American Women With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities and Their Caregivers: Protocol for Feasibility and Acceptability Testing.JMIR research protocols · 2023Article
- Breast Cancer Screening Among Women With Intellectual Disability in Denmark.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- County-Level Social Vulnerability and Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates in the US, 2018.JAMA network open · 2022Article
- Disparities in cancer-related healthcare among people with intellectual disabilities: A population-based cohort study with health insurance claims data.Cancer medicine · 2020Article
- Ensuring the Reproductive Rights of Women with Intellectual Disability.Journal of intellectual & developmental disability · 2020Article
- Factors associated with ambulatory care sensitive emergency department visits for South Carolina Medicaid members with intellectual disability.Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Each year in the United States, about 4000 deaths are attributed to cervical cancer, and over 40,000 deaths are attributed to breast cancer (U.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group, 2015). The purpose of this study was to identify predictors of full, partial, and no screening for breast and cervical cancer among women with and without intellectual disability (ID) who are within the age group for screening recommended by the U.S. Preventive Service Task Force (USPSTF), while accounting for changes in recommendations over the study period. Women with ID and an age matched comparison group of women without ID were identified using merged South Carolina Medicaid and Medicare files from 2000 to 2010. The sample consisted of 9406 and 16,806 women for mammography screening and Papanicolaou (Pap) testing adherence, respectively. We estimated multinomial logistic regression models and determined that women with ID were significantly less likely than women without ID to be fully adherent compared to no screening with mammography recommendations (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55-0.72), and Pap testing recommendations (AOR: 0.17, 95% CI 0.16-0.19). For the 70% of women with ID for whom we had residential information, those who lived in a group home, medical facility, or supervised community living setting were more likely to be fully adherent with both preventive services than those living alone or with family members. For both outcomes, women residing in a supervised nonmedical community living setting had the highest odds of full adherence, adjusting for other covariates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.