Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28455098›Full record

ArticleBiochimica et biophysica acta. Biomembranes2017

Computing osmotic permeabilities of aquaporins AQP4, AQP5, and GlpF from near-equilibrium simulations.

Thierry O Wambo, Roberto A Rodriguez, Liao Y Chen

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochimica et biophysica acta. Biomembranes, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 81% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Multiple pore lining residues modulate water permeability of GlpF.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2022
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. RSC advances · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Cooperativity and allostery in aquaporin 0 regulation by CaBiochimica et biophysica acta. Biomembranes · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Thierry O WamboDepartment of Physics, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78249, USA.
Roberto A RodriguezDepartment of Physics, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78249, USA.
Liao Y ChenDepartment of Physics, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78249, USA. Electronic address: Liao.Chen@utsa.edu.
The University of Texas at San Antonio · US

Funding

UTSA RISE Research Training ProgramR25GM060655 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO · PI BAREA-RODRIGUEZ, EDWIN J · 2000 to 2022
$21.6M
Theoretical study of structure-function correlations of Aquaporin V and mutantsSC3GM084834 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO · PI CHEN, LIAO Y · 2008 to 2016
$865k
NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM060655NIGMS NIH HHS SC3 GM084834
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measuring or computing the single-channel permeability of aquaporins/aquaglyceroporins (AQPs) has long been a challenge. The measured values scatter over an order of magnitude but the corresponding Arrhenius activation energies converge in the current literature. Osmotic flux through an AQP was simulated as water current forced through the channel by kilobar hydraulic pressure or theoretically approximated as single-file diffusion. In this paper, we report large scale simulations of osmotic current under sub M gradient through three AQPs (water channels AQP4 and AQP5 and glycerol-water channel GlpF) using the mature particle mesh Ewald technique (PME) for which the established force fields have been optimized with known accuracy. These simulations were implemented with hybrid periodic boundary conditions devised to avoid the artifactitious mixing across the membrane in a regular PME simulation. The computed single-channel permeabilities at 5°C and 25°C are in agreement with recently refined experiments on GlpF. The Arrhenius activation energies extracted from our simulations for all the three AQPs agree with the in vitro measurements. The single-file diffusion approximations from our large-scale simulations are consistent with the current literature on smaller systems. From these unambiguous agreements among the in vitro and in silico studies, we observe the quantitative accuracy of the all-atom force fields of the current literature for water-channel biology. We also observe that AQP4, that is particularly rich in the central nervous system, is more efficient in water conduction and more temperature-sensitive than other water-only channels (excluding glycerol channels that also conduct water when not inhibited by glycerol).

Indexed as

Aquaporin 4Aquaporin 5AquaporinsDiffusionEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsHumansKineticsMolecular Dynamics SimulationOsmolar ConcentrationPermeabilityTemperatureThermodynamicsWaterAQP4 protein, humanAQP5 protein, humanAquaporin 4Aquaporin 5AquaporinsEscherichia coli ProteinsGlpF protein, E coliWaterAquaporinGlycerol channelMolecular dynamicsOsmotic permeabilityWater channel

Identifiers

PMID28455098
PMCPMC5493307
OpenAlexW2938373492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.