ArticleMethods (San Diego, Calif.)2017
Functional association prediction by community profiling.
Article in Methods (San Diego, Calif.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metabolomics as an Emerging Tool in the Search for Astrobiologically Relevant Biomarkers.Astrobiology · 2020Review
- A repository of microbial marker genes related to human health and diseases for host phenotype prediction using microbiome data.Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing · 2019Article
- Machine learning methods and systems for data-driven discovery in biomedical informatics.Methods (San Diego, Calif.) · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent years have witnessed unprecedented accumulation of DNA sequences and therefore protein sequences (predicted from DNA sequences), due to the advances of sequencing technology. One of the major sources of the hypothetical proteins is the metagenomics research. Current annotation of metagenomes (collections of short metagenomic sequences or assemblies) relies on similarity searches against known gene/protein families, based on which functional profiles of microbial communities can be built. This practice, however, leaves out the hypothetical proteins, which may outnumber the known proteins for many microbial communities. On the other hand, we may ask: what can we gain from the large number of metagenomes made available by the metagenomic studies, for the annotation of metagenomic sequences as well as functional annotation of hypothetical proteins in general? Here we propose a community profiling approach for predicting functional associations between proteins: two proteins are predicted to be associated if they share similar presence and absence profiles (called community profiles) across microbial communities. Community profiling is conceptually similar to the phylogenetic profiling approach to functional prediction, however with fundamental differences. We tested different profile construction methods, the selection of reference metagenomes, and correlation metrics, among others, to optimize the performance of this new approach. We demonstrated that the community profiling approach alone slightly outperforms the phylogenetic profiling approach for associating proteins in species that are well represented by sequenced genomes, and combining phylogenetic and community profiling further improves (though only marginally) the prediction of functional association. Further we showed that community profiling method significantly outperforms phylogenetic profiling, revealing more functional associations, when applied to a more recently sequenced bacterial genome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.