ArticleOncology letters2017
Applied analysis of ultrasound-guided ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerve blocks in the radical surgery of aged cervical cancer.
Article in Oncology letters, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Postoperative Pain Following Gynecology Oncological Surgery: A Systematic Review by Tumor Site.Cancers · 2025Review
- Peripheral regional anaesthesia and outcomes: a narrative review of the literature from 2013 to 2023.British journal of anaesthesia · 2024Review
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of nerve block under ultrasound in ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric in children.Translational pediatrics · 2022Article
- Awake spine surgery: An eye-opening movement.Surgical neurology international · 2021Review
- Thymoquinone Inhibits the Migration and Invasive Characteristics of Cervical Cancer Cells SiHa and CaSki In Vitro by Targeting Epithelial to Mesenchymal Transition Associated Transcription Factors Twist1 and Zeb1.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the present study, we evaluated the effects of ultrasound-guided ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerve blocks and intratracheal general anesthesia in the radical surgery of aged cervical cancer. From June 2014 to December 2014, 62 patients diagnosed with aged cervical cancer were enrolled in this study. The patients conformed to the indication of cervical cancer radical surgery. Patients were randomly divided into the test group and the control group according to the random number table with 31 individuals in each group. General anesthesia and compound ultrasound-guided ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerve blocks were applied in the test group, while intratracheal general anesthesia was used in the control group. The results showed that the operative time, awake time and the total dosage of propofol and sufentanil in the test group were significantly lower than those in the control group. The postoperative VAS score, the times to press the automatic control bump and continuous application time of the automatic control bump in the test group were significantly less than those in the control group. The occurrence rate of anesthesia-related adverse reactions in the test group during the perioperative period was significantly lower than that in the control group. Differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). We concluded that ultrasound-guided ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerve blocks significantly improved the analgesic effects during the perioperative and postoperative period in cervical cancer radical surgeries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.