Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28453776›Full record

ArticleProtein engineering, design & selection : PEDS2017

Modulating and evaluating receptor promiscuity through directed evolution and modeling.

Sarah C Stainbrook, Jessica S Yu, Michael P Reddick, Neda Bagheri, Keith E J Tyo

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. ProtMiscuity: a database of promiscuous proteins.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2019
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sarah C StainbrookInterdisciplinary Biological Sciences Program, Northwestern University, 2145 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208, USA.
Jessica S YuChemical and Biological Engineering, Northwestern University, 2145 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208, USA.
Michael P ReddickChemical and Biological Engineering, Northwestern University, 2145 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208, USA.
Neda BagheriInterdisciplinary Biological Sciences Program, Northwestern University, 2145 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208, USA.
Keith E J TyoInterdisciplinary Biological Sciences Program, Northwestern University, 2145 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208, USA.
Northwestern University · US

Funding

Tumor Environment and Metastasis (TEAM) Research ProgramP30CA060553 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI Daniela E Matei · 1993 to 2026
$153.9M
FACSAria SORP Cell SorterS10OD011996 · OD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI GOOLSBY, CHARLES L. · 2012 to 2012
$482k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA060553NIH HHS S10 OD011996
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The promiscuity of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) has broad implications in disease, pharmacology and biosensing. Promiscuity is a particularly crucial consideration for protein engineering, where the ability to modulate and model promiscuity is essential for developing desirable proteins. Here, we present methodologies for (i) modifying GPCR promiscuity using directed evolution and (ii) predicting receptor response and identifying important peptide features using quantitative structure-activity relationship models and grouping-exhaustive feature selection. We apply these methodologies to the yeast pheromone receptor Ste2 and its native ligand α-factor. Using directed evolution, we created Ste2 mutants with altered specificity toward a library of α-factor variants. We then used the  Vectors of Hydrophobic, Steric, and Electronic properties and partial least squares regression to characterize receptor-ligand interactions, identify important ligand positions and properties, and predict receptor response to novel ligands. Together, directed evolution and computational analysis enable the control and evaluation of GPCR promiscuity. These approaches should be broadly useful for the study and engineering of GPCRs and other protein-small molecule interactions.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularReceptors, Cell SurfaceBinding SitesDirected Molecular EvolutionLeast-Squares AnalysisProtein BindingProtein EngineeringReceptors, Mating FactorSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsReceptors, Cell SurfaceReceptors, Mating FactorSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSTE2 protein, S cerevisiaedirected evolutionpartial least squares regression (PLSR)receptor promiscuity

Identifiers

PMID28453776
PMCPMC6283399
OpenAlexW2608238382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.