SynthesisHealth policy and planning2017
Does charging different user fees for primary and secondary care affect first-contacts with primary healthcare? A systematic review.
Synthesis in Health policy and planning, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Health and health system impacts of China's comprehensive primary healthcare reforms: a systematic review.Health policy and planning · 2023Pooled it
- Temporal Trends in Patient Choice of Outpatient Care Provider Among Vietnam's Insured Rural Residents, 2006-2020.The International journal of health planning and management · 2025Article
- The impacts of removing pharmaceutical co-payments for chronic conditions at primary care level: a pilot study in rural China.Health policy and planning · 2025Article
- Effects of pay for performance in primary care in an under-registration scenario.Revista de saude publica · 2024Article
- Health care seeking in modern urban LMIC settings: evidence from Lusaka, Zambia.BMC public health · 2022Article
- Economic Aspects of Delivering Primary Care Services: An Evidence Synthesis to Inform Policy and Research Priorities.The Milbank quarterly · 2021Article
- Impact of differential copayment on patient healthcare choice: evidence from South Korean National Cohort Study.BMJ open · 2021Article
- Do patients bypass primary care for common health problems under a free-access system? Experience of Taiwan.BMC health services research · 2020Article
- Rethinking primary care user fees: is charging a fee for appointments a solution to NHS underfunding?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2019Article
- Primary healthcare policy and governance in low-income and middle-income countries: an evidence gap map.BMJ global health · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Policy-makers are increasingly considering charging users different fees between primary and secondary care (differential user charges) to encourage utilisation of primary health care in health systems with limited gate keeping. A systematic review was conducted to evaluate the impact of introducing differential user charges on service utilisation. We reviewed studies published in MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane library, EconLIT, HMIC, and WHO library databases from January 1990 until June 2015. We extracted data from the studies meeting defined eligibility criteria and assessed study quality using an established checklist. We synthesized evidence narratively. Eight studies from six countries met our eligibility criteria. The overall study quality was low, with diversity in populations, interventions, settings, and methods. Five studies examined the introduction of or increase in user charges for secondary care, with four showing decreased secondary care utilisation, and three showing increased primary care utilisation. One study identified an increase in primary care utilisation after primary care user charges were reduced. The introduction of a non-referral charge in secondary care was associated with lower primary care utilisation in one study. One study compared user charges across insurance plans, associating higher charges in secondary care with higher utilisation in both primary and secondary care. Overall, the impact of introducing differential user-charges on primary care utilisation remains uncertain. Further research is required to understand their impact as a demand side intervention, including implications for health system costs and on utilisation among low-income patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.