ArticleAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2017
Towards a global cancer knowledge network: dissecting the current international cancer genomic sequencing landscape.
Article in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Financing and Reimbursement Models for Personalised Medicine: A Systematic Review to Identify Current Models and Future Options.Applied health economics and health policy · 2022Pooled it
- Developing general practitioner and consumer supports for genomics in Australian primary care: a mixed-methods protocol.BMJ open · 2026Article
- The economic costs of precision medicine for clinical translational research among children with high-risk cancer.NPJ precision oncology · 2024Article
- Challenges and solutions to system-wide use of precision oncology as the standard of care paradigm.Cambridge prisms. Precision medicine · 2024Review
- OHDSI-compliance: a set of document templates facilitating the implementation and operation of a software stack for real-world evidence generation.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Role of Incentives in the Use of Blockchain-Based Platforms for Sharing Sensitive Health Data: Experimental Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- A survey of experts on personalized medicine landscape in European Union and China.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- A Blockchain-Based Dynamic Consent Architecture to Support Clinical Genomic Data Sharing (ConsentChain): Proof-of-Concept Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2021Article
- Privacy-preserving data sharing infrastructures for medical research: systematization and comparison.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2021Article
- Transitioning the Molecular Tumor Board from Proof of Concept to Clinical Routine: A German Single-Center Analysis.Cancers · 2021Article
- Ten simple rules for annotating sequencing experiments.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Implementing the FAIR Data Principles in precision oncology: review of supporting initiatives.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2020Review
- Blockchain-based platforms for genomic data sharing: a de-centralized approach in response to the governance problems?Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2019Article
- Interim analysis of a real-world precision medicine platform for molecular profiling of metastatic or advanced cancers: MONDTI.ESMO open · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWhile next generation sequencing has enhanced our understanding of the biological basis of malignancy, current knowledge on global practices for sequencing cancer samples is limited. To address this deficiency, we developed a survey to provide a snapshot of current sequencing activities globally, identify barriers to data sharing and use this information to develop sustainable solutions for the cancer research community.
methodsA multi-item survey was conducted assessing demographics, clinical data collection, genomic platforms, privacy/ethics concerns, funding sources and data sharing barriers for sequencing initiatives globally. Additionally, respondents were asked as to provide the primary intent of their initiative (clinical diagnostic, research or combination).
resultsOf 107 initiatives invited to participate, 59 responded (response rate = 55%). Whole exome sequencing (P = 0.03) and whole genome sequencing (P = 0.01) were utilized less frequently in clinical diagnostic than in research initiatives. Procedures to identify cancer-specific variants were heterogeneous, with bioinformatics pipelines employing different mutation calling/variant annotation algorithms. Measurement of treatment efficacy varied amongst initiatives, with time on treatment (57%) and RECIST (53%) being the most common; however, other parameters were also employed. Whilst 72% of initiatives indicated data sharing, its scope varied, with a number of restrictions in place (e.g. transfer of raw data). The largest perceived barriers to data harmonization were the lack of financial support (P < 0.01) and bioinformatics concerns (e.g. lack of interoperability) (P = 0.02). Capturing clinical data was more likely to be perceived as a barrier to data sharing by larger initiatives than by smaller initiatives (P = 0.01).
conclusionsThese results identify the main barriers, as perceived by the cancer sequencing community, to effective sharing of cancer genomic and clinical data. They highlight the need for greater harmonization of technical, ethical and data capture processes in cancer sample sequencing worldwide, in order to support effective and responsible data sharing for the benefit of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.