ArticleAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2017
Prediction of overall survival in stage II and III colon cancer beyond TNM system: a retrospective, pooled biomarker study.
Article in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 137 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Multicenter Phase III Open Label Randomized Trial Comparing CPT-11 In Combination With A 5-FU/FA Infusional Regimen To The Same 5-FU/FA Infusional Regimen Alone As Adjuvant Treatment Of Stage III Colon Cancer
A Randomized Phase III Trial of Oxaliplatin (OXAL) Plus 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU)/Leucovorin (CF) With or Without Cetuximab (C225) After Curative Resection for Patients With Stage III Colon Cancer
Treatment of Colorectal Cancer With Autologous Cytokine Induced Killer Cells (CIK)
Predicting Recurrence-Free Survival in Stage III and High-Risk Stage II Colorectal Cancer After Curative-Intent Treatment
Who cites it
137 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 248 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tumor characteristics impact prognosis in deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite instability-high localized colorectal cancer-a systematic review and meta-analysis.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2026Pooled it
- Impact of chemotherapy on patients with mismatch repair deficient advanced endometrial carcinomas-a meta-analysis.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2024Pooled it
- Genomic and epigenomic biomarkers in colorectal cancer: From diagnosis to therapy.Advances in cancer research · 2021Pooled it
- Temporal Trends in Clinical Evidence of 5-Year Survival Within Electronic Health Records Among Patients With Early-Stage Colon Cancer Managed With Laparoscopy-Assisted Colectomy vs Open Colectomy.JAMA network open · 2022Trial
- Tumour-infiltrating CD8British journal of cancer · 2019Trial
- Mutation burden and other molecular markers of prognosis in colorectal cancer treated with curative intent: results from the QUASAR 2 clinical trial and an Australian community-based series.The lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2018Trial
- Physical Activity and Outcomes in Patients with Stage III Colon Cancer: A Correlative Analysis of Phase III Trial NCCTG N0147 (Alliance).Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2018Trial
- p53 and p21 Status Influences Cellular Response to Metformin inCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2026Article
- The Exchangeable Copper-Zinc Ratio Links Sex Hormones, Tumor Burden, and Epithelial Remodeling in Colorectal Cancer.Biomolecules · 2026Article
- KRAS and MYC synergistic inhibition: a powerful strategy targeting KRAS-mutant cancers.Molecular cancer · 2026Review
- A real-world study of Trifluridine/Tipiracil (TAS-102) combined with bevacizumab as the late-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Prognostic Impact of RAS and TP53 Mutation Profiles in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Intratumoral microbiota-host gene associations characterize stage-associated microecological patterns in colorectal cancer.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- In Silico Analysis of the Dual Role of Tumor Microenvironment on Colon Cancer Subtypes.Cancer informatics · 2026Article
- Integrative multi-omics analysis identifies a CMA-associated heterogeneity risk score and a cDCs-based immune score for robust prognostic stratification in colon cancer with single-center and experimental validation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Preoperative HALP and LMR predict disease-free survival in stage III colon cancer and enable nomogram-based risk stratification.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Deep learning-enabled multiphoton microscopy predicts colorectal cancer recurrence from routine FFPE specimens.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Differentiation grade is highly concordant between matched primary and metastatic colorectal cancer.Clinical & experimental metastasis · 2025Article
- Review
- Pancancer outcome prediction via a unified weakly supervised deep learning model.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025Article
77 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
19 authors at 10 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Background: TNM staging alone does not accurately predict outcome in colon cancer (CC) patients who may be eligible for adjuvant chemotherapy. It is unknown to what extent the molecular markers microsatellite instability (MSI) and mutations in BRAF or KRAS improve prognostic estimation in multivariable models that include detailed clinicopathological annotation. Patients and methods: After imputation of missing at random data, a subset of patients accrued in phase 3 trials with adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 3016)-N0147 (NCT00079274) and PETACC3 (NCT00026273)-was aggregated to construct multivariable Cox models for 5-year overall survival that were subsequently validated internally in the remaining clinical trial samples (n = 1499), and also externally in different population cohorts of chemotherapy-treated (n = 949) or -untreated (n = 1080) CC patients, and an additional series without treatment annotation (n = 782). Results: TNM staging, MSI and BRAFV600E mutation status remained independent prognostic factors in multivariable models across clinical trials cohorts and observational studies. Concordance indices increased from 0.61-0.68 in the TNM alone model to 0.63-0.71 in models with added molecular markers, 0.65-0.73 with clinicopathological features and 0.66-0.74 with all covariates. In validation cohorts with complete annotation, the integrated time-dependent AUC rose from 0.64 for the TNM alone model to 0.67 for models that included clinicopathological features, with or without molecular markers. In patient cohorts that received adjuvant chemotherapy, the relative proportion of variance explained (R2) by TNM, clinicopathological features and molecular markers was on an average 65%, 25% and 10%, respectively. Conclusions: Incorporation of MSI, BRAFV600E and KRAS mutation status to overall survival models with TNM staging improves the ability to precisely prognosticate in stage II and III CC patients, but only modestly increases prediction accuracy in multivariable models that include clinicopathological features, particularly in chemotherapy-treated patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.