Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28453697›Full record

ArticleAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2017

Prediction of overall survival in stage II and III colon cancer beyond TNM system: a retrospective, pooled biomarker study.

R Dienstmann, M J Mason, F A Sinicrope, A I Phipps, S Tejpar, A Nesbakken, S A Danielsen, A Sveen, D D Buchanan, M Clendenning and 9 more

4 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 137 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
137citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00026273 phase3completednot on this map

Multicenter Phase III Open Label Randomized Trial Comparing CPT-11 In Combination With A 5-FU/FA Infusional Regimen To The Same 5-FU/FA Infusional Regimen Alone As Adjuvant Treatment Of Stage III Colon Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorPfizerRan2001ConditionsColorectal CancerArmsFOLFIRI regimen, fluorouracil, irinotecan hydrochloride, leucovorin calcium
NCT00079274 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomized Phase III Trial of Oxaliplatin (OXAL) Plus 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU)/Leucovorin (CF) With or Without Cetuximab (C225) After Curative Resection for Patients With Stage III Colon Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Ran2004 to 2012Enrolled3,397ConditionsAdenocarcinoma of the Colon, Stage III Colon CancerArmsirinotecan hydrochloride, oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, fluorouracil, cetuximab
NCT05676190 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Treatment of Colorectal Cancer With Autologous Cytokine Induced Killer Cells (CIK)

TypeinterventionalSponsorShiCang YuRan2023 to 2027Enrolled80ConditionsColorectal CancerArmsCIK combined with chemotherapy group, CIK combined immunotherapy group, CIK combined targeted therapy group, CIK in combination with other therapies
NCT06314958 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Predicting Recurrence-Free Survival in Stage III and High-Risk Stage II Colorectal Cancer After Curative-Intent Treatment

TypeobservationalSponsorCity of Hope Medical CenterRan2023 to 2028Enrolled400ConditionsColorectal Cancer, Colorectal Adenocarcinoma, Colorectal Cancer Stage II, Colorectal Cancer Stage IIIArmsCENSURE
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

137 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 248 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Tumour-infiltrating CD8British journal of cancer · 2019
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Physical Activity and Outcomes in Patients with Stage III Colon Cancer: A Correlative Analysis of Phase III Trial NCCTG N0147 (Alliance).Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2018
    Trial
  8. p53 and p21 Status Influences Cellular Response to Metformin inCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

77 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 10 institutions in 5 countries.

R DienstmannComputational Oncology, Sage Bionetworks, Seattle, USA.
M J MasonComputational Oncology, Sage Bionetworks, Seattle, USA.
F A SinicropeDivision of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Comprehensive Cancer Center, Rochester.
A I PhippsEpidemiology Department, University of Washington and Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, USA.
S TejparMolecular Digestive Oncology Unit, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium.
A NesbakkenDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine, and K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
S A DanielsenDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, and K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
A SveenDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, and K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
D D BuchananColorectal Oncogenomics Group, Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.
M ClendenningColorectal Oncogenomics Group, Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.
C RostyColorectal Oncogenomics Group, Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.
B BotComputational Oncology, Sage Bionetworks, Seattle, USA.
S R AlbertsDivision of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Comprehensive Cancer Center, Rochester.
J Milburn JessupDiagnostics Evaluation Branch, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, National Institute of Health, Rockville, USA.
R A LotheDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, and K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
M DelorenziSIB Swiss Institute Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland.
P A NewcombEpidemiology Department, University of Washington and Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, USA.
D SargentDivision of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA.
J GuinneyComputational Oncology, Sage Bionetworks, Seattle, USA.
Oslo University Hospital · NOFred Hutch Cancer Center · USSage Bionetworks · USSeattle University · USUniversity of Melbourne · AUWinnMed · USEnvoi Specialist Pathologists · AUMayo Clinic · USNational Cancer Institute · USSIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics · CH

Funding

Women's Cancer ProgramP30CA015083 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI AKHILESH PANDEY · 1985 to 2026
$151.3M
ONTARIO REGISTRY FOR STUDIES OF FAMILIAL COLON CANCERU01CA074783 · NCI · CANCER CARE ONTARIO · PI GALLINGER, STEVEN · 1997 to 2008
$12.5M
Colon Cancer Family Registry CohortUM1CA167551 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HAILE, ROBERT WILLIAM, JENKINS, MARK A · 2013 to 2017
$11.3M
FAMILIAL COLORECTAL NEOPLASIA COLLABORATIVE GROUPU01CA074800 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI LINDOR, NORALANE MOREY · 1997 to 2007
$9.1M
The Colon Cancer Family Registry: SeattleU24CA074794 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI NEWCOMB, POLLY A · 2008 to 2011
$7.0M
AUSTRALASIAN COLORECTAL CANCER FAMILY REGISTRYU01CA097735 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE · PI HOPPER, JOHN L · 2002 to 2007
$6.9M
The Colon Cancer Family Registry: AustralasiaU24CA097735 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE · PI HOPPER, JOHN L · 2008 to 2011
$6.2M
The Familial Colorectal Neoplasia Collaborative GroupU24CA074800 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI LINDOR, NORALANE MOREY, THIBODEAU, STEPHEN NORMAN · 2008 to 2011
$5.3M
The Colon Cancer Family Registry: OntarioU24CA074783 · NCI · CANCER CARE ONTARIO · PI GALLINGER, STEVEN · 2008 to 2011
$4.1M
Integration of Genomic and Clinical Data to Enhance Subtyping of Colon CancerR01CA210509 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI SINICROPE, FRANK A. · 2017 to 2021
$2.0M
Training and Research in Colon Cancer SurvivalK05CA152715 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI NEWCOMB, POLLY A · 2010 to 2019
$991k
Lifestyle Factors and Survival Outcomes for Colorectal Cancer Molecular SubtypesK07CA172298 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI PHIPPS, AMANDA IRENE · 2013 to 2016
$406k
NCI NIH HHS K05 CA152715NCI NIH HHS K07 CA172298NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015083NCI NIH HHS R01 CA210509NCI NIH HHS U01 CA074783NCI NIH HHS U01 CA074800NCI NIH HHS U01 CA097735NCI NIH HHS U24 CA074783NCI NIH HHS U24 CA074794NCI NIH HHS U24 CA074800NCI NIH HHS U24 CA097735NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA167551
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: TNM staging alone does not accurately predict outcome in colon cancer (CC) patients who may be eligible for adjuvant chemotherapy. It is unknown to what extent the molecular markers microsatellite instability (MSI) and mutations in BRAF or KRAS improve prognostic estimation in multivariable models that include detailed clinicopathological annotation. Patients and methods: After imputation of missing at random data, a subset of patients accrued in phase 3 trials with adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 3016)-N0147 (NCT00079274) and PETACC3 (NCT00026273)-was aggregated to construct multivariable Cox models for 5-year overall survival that were subsequently validated internally in the remaining clinical trial samples (n = 1499), and also externally in different population cohorts of chemotherapy-treated (n = 949) or -untreated (n = 1080) CC patients, and an additional series without treatment annotation (n = 782). Results: TNM staging, MSI and BRAFV600E mutation status remained independent prognostic factors in multivariable models across clinical trials cohorts and observational studies. Concordance indices increased from 0.61-0.68 in the TNM alone model to 0.63-0.71 in models with added molecular markers, 0.65-0.73 with clinicopathological features and 0.66-0.74 with all covariates. In validation cohorts with complete annotation, the integrated time-dependent AUC rose from 0.64 for the TNM alone model to 0.67 for models that included clinicopathological features, with or without molecular markers. In patient cohorts that received adjuvant chemotherapy, the relative proportion of variance explained (R2) by TNM, clinicopathological features and molecular markers was on an average 65%, 25% and 10%, respectively. Conclusions: Incorporation of MSI, BRAFV600E and KRAS mutation status to overall survival models with TNM staging improves the ability to precisely prognosticate in stage II and III CC patients, but only modestly increases prediction accuracy in multivariable models that include clinicopathological features, particularly in chemotherapy-treated patients.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorColonic NeoplasmsFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingProportional Hazards ModelsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultBiomarkers, TumorBRAF mutationcolon cancerKRAS mutationmicrosatellite instabilityprognosis

Identifiers

PMID28453697
PMCPMC5406760
OpenAlexW2586254558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.