Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28453695›Full record

ArticleAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2017

Genetic variants of DNA repair-related genes predict efficacy of TAS-102 in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.

M Suenaga, M Schirripa, S Cao, W Zhang, D Yang, S Murgioni, D Rossini, F Marmorino, A Mennitto, Y Ning and 8 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

M SuenagaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
M SchirripaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
S CaoDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
W ZhangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
D YangDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
S MurgioniMedical Oncology 1 Unit, Istituto Oncologico Veneto, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Padova, Italy.
D RossiniPolo Oncologico, Istituto Toscano Tumori, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy.
F MarmorinoPolo Oncologico, Istituto Toscano Tumori, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy.
A MennittoMedical Oncology Department, Fondazione Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Y NingDepartment of Medical Oncology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
S OkazakiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
M D BergerDepartment of Medical Oncology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
Y MiyamotoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
R GopezDepartment of Medical Oncology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
A BarziDepartment of Medical Oncology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
T YamaguchiGastroenterology Center, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
F LoupakisMedical Oncology 1 Unit, Istituto Oncologico Veneto, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Padova, Italy.
H-J LenzDepartment of Medical Oncology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
University of Southern California · USAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana · ITIstituto Oncologico Veneto · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITJapanese Foundation For Cancer Research · JP

Funding

USC/NORRIS COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER (CORE) SUPPORTP30CA014089 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI MYLES G COCKBURN · 1985 to 2026
$181.4M
Efficacy of Novel Wnt Modulator in Colon CancerR01CA166161 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI KAHN, MICHAEL, LENZ, HEINZ JOSEF · 2013 to 2017
$2.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014089NCI NIH HHS R01 CA166161
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Tri-phosphorylated trifluridine (FTD) incorporation into DNA is TAS-102's main anti-tumor action. We tested whether genetic polymorphisms in homologous recombination (HR) and cell cycle checkpoint pathway for DNA repair is associated with outcomes in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients treated with TAS-102. Patients and methods: We analyzed genomic DNA extracted from 233 samples of three cohorts: an evaluation cohort of 52 patients receiving TAS-102, a validation cohort of 129 patients receiving TAS-102 and a control cohort of 52 patients receiving regorafenib. Single nucleotide polymorphisms of genes involved in HR (ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, XRCC3, FANCD2, H2AX, RAD51) and cell cycle checkpoint (ATR, CHEK1, CHEK2, CDKN1A, TP53, CHE1, PIN1, PCNA) were analyzed by PCR-based direct sequencing. Results: In univariate analysis for the evaluation cohort, patients with any G allele in ATM rs609429 had longer overall survival (OS) than those with the C/C variant (8.7 vs. 4.4 months, HR 0.37, 95% CI: 0.14-0.99, P = 0.022). Patients carrying any A allele in XRCC3 rs861539 had significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) (3.8 vs. 2.3 months, HR 0.44, 95% CI: 0.21-0.92, P = 0.024) and OS (15.6 vs. 6.3 months, HR 0.25, 95% CI: 0.08-0.79, P = 0.012) than those with the G/G variant. In multivariable analysis, ATM rs609429 remained significant for OS (P = 0.020). In the validation cohort, patients having ATM rs609429 with any G allele showed longer OS and PFS; the G/A variant in XRCC3 rs861539 showed longer OS, though without statistical significance. Conclusion: Genetic variants in the HR pathway may predict clinical outcome in mCRC patients receiving TAS-102.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsColorectal NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalDNA Repair EnzymesDrug CombinationsDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFemaleGenetic Association StudiesHumansLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPhenylurea CompoundsAntineoplastic AgentsDNA Repair EnzymesDrug CombinationsPhenylurea CompoundsPyridinesPyrrolidinesregorafenibThymineTrifluridinetrifluridine tipiracil drug combinationUracilATMcell cycle checkpointDNA repairmetastatic colorectal cancerTAS-102

Identifiers

PMID28453695
PMCPMC5834058
OpenAlexW2586410631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.