ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2017
Linearity of network proximity measures: implications for set-based queries and significance testing.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inflammatory pathway analytes predicting rapid cognitive decline in MCI stage of Alzheimer's disease.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2020Article
- Integrated querying and version control of context-specific biological networks.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2020Article
- CD105 Is Expressed in Ovarian Cancer Precursor Lesions and Is Required for Metastasis to the Ovary.Cancers · 2019Article
- Key inflammatory pathway activations in the MCI stage of Alzheimer's disease.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2019Article
- In Situ Vaccination with Cowpea vs Tobacco Mosaic Virus against Melanoma.Molecular pharmaceutics · 2018Article
- Integrated in vivo multiomics analysis identifies p21-activated kinase signaling as a driver of colitis.Science signaling · 2018Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Motivation: In recent years, various network proximity measures have been proposed to facilitate the use of biomolecular interaction data in a broad range of applications. These applications include functional annotation, disease gene prioritization, comparative analysis of biological systems and prediction of new interactions. In such applications, a major task is the scoring or ranking of the nodes in the network in terms of their proximity to a given set of 'seed' nodes (e.g. a group of proteins that are identified to be associated with a disease, or are deferentially expressed in a certain condition). Many different network proximity measures are utilized for this purpose, and these measures are quite diverse in terms of the benefits they offer. Results: We propose a unifying framework for characterizing network proximity measures for set-based queries. We observe that many existing measures are linear, in that the proximity of a node to a set of nodes can be represented as an aggregation of its proximity to the individual nodes in the set. Based on this observation, we propose methods for processing of set-based proximity queries that take advantage of sparse local proximity information. In addition, we provide an analytical framework for characterizing the distribution of proximity scores based on reference models that accurately capture the characteristics of the seed set (e.g. degree distribution and biological function). The resulting framework facilitates computation of exact figures for the statistical significance of network proximity scores, enabling assessment of the accuracy of Monte Carlo simulation based estimation methods. Availability and Implementation: Implementations of the methods in this paper are available at https://bioengine.case.edu/crosstalker which includes a robust visualization for results viewing. Contact: stm@case.edu or mxk331@case.edu. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.