Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28453667›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2017

Linearity of network proximity measures: implications for set-based queries and significance testing.

Sean Maxwell, Mark R Chance, Mehmet Koyutürk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Integrated querying and version control of context-specific biological networks.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2020
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Key inflammatory pathway activations in the MCI stage of Alzheimer's disease.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sean MaxwellCenter for Proteomics and Bioinformatics.
Mark R ChanceCenter for Proteomics and Bioinformatics.
Mehmet KoyutürkCenter for Proteomics and Bioinformatics.

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative of ClevelandUL1TR000439 · NCATS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI KONSTAN, MICHAEL W. · 2012 to 2016
$50.0M
Phospho Proteomics Alzheimers SupplementR01GM117208 · NIGMS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI CHANCE, MARK R · 2016 to 2018
$1.4M
Theoretical Foundations and Software Infrastructure for Biological Network DatabasesU01CA198941 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI KOYUTURK, MEHMET · 2015 to 2017
$1.4M
Enhancing Genome-Wide Association Studies via Integrative Network AnalysisR01LM011247 · NLM · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI KOYUTURK, MEHMET · 2012 to 2015
$1.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000439NCI NIH HHS U01 CA198941NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM117208NLM NIH HHS R01 LM011247
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: In recent years, various network proximity measures have been proposed to facilitate the use of biomolecular interaction data in a broad range of applications. These applications include functional annotation, disease gene prioritization, comparative analysis of biological systems and prediction of new interactions. In such applications, a major task is the scoring or ranking of the nodes in the network in terms of their proximity to a given set of 'seed' nodes (e.g. a group of proteins that are identified to be associated with a disease, or are deferentially expressed in a certain condition). Many different network proximity measures are utilized for this purpose, and these measures are quite diverse in terms of the benefits they offer. Results: We propose a unifying framework for characterizing network proximity measures for set-based queries. We observe that many existing measures are linear, in that the proximity of a node to a set of nodes can be represented as an aggregation of its proximity to the individual nodes in the set. Based on this observation, we propose methods for processing of set-based proximity queries that take advantage of sparse local proximity information. In addition, we provide an analytical framework for characterizing the distribution of proximity scores based on reference models that accurately capture the characteristics of the seed set (e.g. degree distribution and biological function). The resulting framework facilitates computation of exact figures for the statistical significance of network proximity scores, enabling assessment of the accuracy of Monte Carlo simulation based estimation methods. Availability and Implementation: Implementations of the methods in this paper are available at https://bioengine.case.edu/crosstalker which includes a robust visualization for results viewing. Contact: stm@case.edu or mxk331@case.edu. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationMonte Carlo MethodComputational BiologyHumans

Identifiers

PMID28453667
PMCPMC5860101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.