Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28453666›Full record

ArticleJournal of public health (Oxford, England)2018

Inequalities in rural communities: adapting national deprivation indices for rural settings.

D Fecht, A Jones, T Hill, T Lindfield, R Thomson, A L Hansell, R Shukla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of public health (Oxford, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. A scoping review of multiple deprivation indices in Europe.European journal of public health · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Can you see me? Participant experience of accessing a weight management programme via group videoconference to overcome barriers to engagement.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Small-area methods for investigation of environment and health.International journal of epidemiology · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

D FechtUK Small Area Health Statistics Unit, MRC-PHE Centre for Environment and Health, Imperial College London, St Mary's Campus, Norfolk Place, London, UK.
A JonesNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK.
T HillPublic Health for Lincolnshire, Lincolnshire County Council, Newland, Lincoln, UK.
T LindfieldPublic Health Suffolk, Suffolk County Council, Endeavour House, 8 Russell Road, Ipswich, UK.
R ThomsonPublic Health for Shropshire, Shropshire Council, Abbey Foregate, Shrewsbury, UK.
A L HansellUK Small Area Health Statistics Unit, MRC-PHE Centre for Environment and Health, Imperial College London, St Mary's Campus, Norfolk Place, London, UK.
R ShuklaPublic Health England, 5 St Phillip's Place, Birmingham, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council G0801056Medical Research Council MR/L01341X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Deprivation indices have been widely used in healthcare research and planning in the United Kingdom. Existing indices, however, are dominated by characteristics of urban populations that may be less relevant in capturing the nature of rural deprivation. We explore if deprivation indices can be modified to make them more sensitive to displaying rural disadvantage in England. Methods: The analysis focussed on the 2011 Carstairs Index (Carstairs2011) and the 2010 English Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD2010). We removed all urban areas as identified by the Office for National Statistics Rural-Urban Area Classifications and mapped the Carstairs2011 and IMD2010 across the remaining rural areas using rural-specific quintiles. Results: Our method was effective in displaying much greater heterogeneity in rural areas than was apparent in the original indices. We received positive feedback from Directors of Public Health who confirmed that the observed patterns mirror their experiences and first-hand knowledge on the ground. Conclusions: Our maps of Carstairs2011 and IMD2010 for rural areas might strengthen the evidence base for rural planning and service provision. The modified deprivation indices, however, were not specifically formulated for rural populations and further work is needed to explore alternative input variables to produce a more rural-specific measure of deprivation.

Indexed as

Socioeconomic FactorsFemaleHumansMaleModels, StatisticalPovertyRural PopulationUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID28453666
PMCPMC6051444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.