Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28453613›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2018

Functional Characterization of the Human Speech Articulation Network.

Alexandra Basilakos, Kimberly G Smith, Paul Fillmore, Julius Fridriksson, Evelina Fedorenko

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The cerebellar components of the human language network.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Tumour-infiltrated cortex participates in large-scale cognitive circuits.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2024
    Article
  16. High-level language brain regions process sublexical regularities.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alexandra BasilakosDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.
Kimberly G SmithDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.
Paul FillmoreDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Baylor University, Waco, TX 76798, USA.
Julius FridrikssonDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.
Evelina FedorenkoDepartment of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
University of South Carolina · USBaylor University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

Telerehab for Aphasia (TERRA)P50DC014664 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI FRIDRIKSSON, JULIUS · 2016 to 2025
$25.0M
NIDCD NIH HHS P50 DC014664
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A number of brain regions have been implicated in articulation, but their precise computations remain debated. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging, we examine the degree of functional specificity of articulation-responsive brain regions to constrain hypotheses about their contributions to speech production. We find that articulation-responsive regions (1) are sensitive to articulatory complexity, but (2) are largely nonoverlapping with nearby domain-general regions that support diverse goal-directed behaviors. Furthermore, premotor articulation regions show selectivity for speech production over some related tasks (respiration control), but not others (nonspeech oral-motor [NSO] movements). This overlap between speech and nonspeech movements concords with electrocorticographic evidence that these regions encode articulators and their states, and with patient evidence whereby articulatory deficits are often accompanied by oral-motor deficits. In contrast, the superior temporal regions show strong selectivity for articulation relative to nonspeech movements, suggesting that these regions play a specific role in speech planning/production. Finally, articulation-responsive portions of posterior inferior frontal gyrus show some selectivity for articulation, in line with the hypothesis that this region prepares an articulatory code that is passed to the premotor cortex. Taken together, these results inform the architecture of the human articulation system.

Indexed as

LanguageSpeechAdolescentAdultBrainBrain MappingElectrocorticographyExecutive FunctionFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMemory, Short-TermMiddle AgedNeural PathwaysOxygen

Identifiers

PMID28453613
PMCPMC5907347
OpenAlexW2608841979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.