Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28453579›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Studies on bacterial community composition are affected by the time and storage method of the rumen content.

Yury Tatiana Granja-Salcedo, Ricardo Andrés Ramirez-Uscategui, Elwi Guillermo Machado, Juliana Duarte Messana, Luciano Takeshi Kishi, Ana Veronica Lino Dias, Telma Teresinha Berchielli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Evaluating tannery wastewater treatment performance based on physicochemical and microbiological characteristics: An Ethiopian case study.Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yury Tatiana Granja-SalcedoDepartment of Animal Science, Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias (FCAV), UNESP - Univ Estadual Paulista, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4783-999X
Ricardo Andrés Ramirez-UscateguiDepartment of Clinical and Veterinary Surgery, Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias (FCAV), UNESP - Univ Estadual Paulista, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil.
Elwi Guillermo MachadoGrupo de Investigación en Medicina Genómica - GIMEGEN, Universidad Simón Bolívar, Barranquilla, Colombia.
Juliana Duarte MessanaDepartment of Animal Science, Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias (FCAV), UNESP - Univ Estadual Paulista, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil.
Luciano Takeshi KishiDepartment of Technology, Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias (FCAV), UNESP - Univ Estadual Paulista, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ana Veronica Lino DiasDepartment of Animal Science, Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias (FCAV), UNESP - Univ Estadual Paulista, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil.
Telma Teresinha BerchielliDepartment of Animal Science, Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias (FCAV), UNESP - Univ Estadual Paulista, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate three storage methods and four storage times for rumen sampling in terms of quality and yield of extracted metagenomic DNA as well as the composition of the rumen bacterial community. One Nellore steer fitted with a ruminal silicone-type cannula was used as a donor of ruminal contents. The experiment comprised 11 experimental groups: pellet control (PC), lyophilized control (LC), P-20: pellet stored frozen at -20°C for a period of 3, 6, and 12 months, P-80: pellet stored frozen at -80°C for a period of 3, 6, and 12 months, and L-20: lyophilized sample stored frozen at -20°C for a period of 3, 6, and 12 months. Metagenomic DNA concentrations were measured spectrophotometrically and fluorometrically and ion torrent sequencing was used to assess the bacterial community composition. The L-20 method could not maintain the yield of DNA during storage. In addition, the P-80 group showed a greater yield of metagenomic DNA than the other groups after 6 months of storage. Rumen samples stored as pellets (P-20 and P-80) resulted in lower richness Chao 1, ACE, and Shannon Wiener indices when compared to PC, while LC and PC were only different in richness ACE. The storage method and storage time influenced the proportions of 14 of 17 phyla identified by sequencing. In the P-20 group, the proportion of Cyanobacteria, Elusimicrobia, Fibrobacteres, Lentisphaerae, Proteobacteria, and Spirochaetes phyla identified was lower than 1%. In the P-80 group, there was an increase in the proportion of the Bacteroidetes phylum (p = 0.010); however, the proportion of Actinobacteria, Chloroflexi, SR1, Synergistetes, TM7, and WPS.2 phyla were unchanged compared to the PC group (p > 0.05). The class Clostridium was the most abundant in all stored groups and increased in its proportion, especially in the L-20 group. The rumen sample storage time significantly reduced the yield of metagenomic DNA extracted. Therefore, the storage method can influence the abundance of phyla, classes, and bacterial families studied in rumen samples and affect the richness and diversity index.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsBacteriaBacterial Physiological PhenomenaBiodiversityCattleCryopreservationDNA, BacterialFluorometryFreeze DryingFreezingRumenSequence Analysis, DNASpectrophotometryTime FactorsDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID28453579
PMCPMC5409139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.