Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28453261›Full record

ArticleJournal of natural products2017

Comparison of Metabolomics Approaches for Evaluating the Variability of Complex Botanical Preparations: Green Tea (Camellia sinensis) as a Case Study.

Joshua J Kellogg, Tyler N Graf, Mary F Paine, Jeannine S McCune, Olav M Kvalheim, Nicholas H Oberlies, Nadja B Cech

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of natural products, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Green Tea Catechins: Nature's Way of Preventing and Treating Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  8. Recent Developments in Metabolomics Studies of Endophytic Fungi.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Joshua J KelloggDepartment of Chemistry & Biochemistry, University of North Carolina at Greensboro , Greensboro, North Carolina 27412, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8685-0353
Tyler N GrafDepartment of Chemistry & Biochemistry, University of North Carolina at Greensboro , Greensboro, North Carolina 27412, United States.
Mary F PaineCollege of Pharmacy, Washington State University , Spokane, Washington 99202, United States.
Jeannine S McCuneDepartment of Pharmaceutics, University of Washington , Seattle, Washington 99202, United States.
Olav M KvalheimDepartment of Chemistry, University of Bergen , Bergen 5020, Norway.
Nicholas H OberliesDepartment of Chemistry & Biochemistry, University of North Carolina at Greensboro , Greensboro, North Carolina 27412, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0354-8464
Nadja B CechDepartment of Chemistry & Biochemistry, University of North Carolina at Greensboro , Greensboro, North Carolina 27412, United States.

Funding

Pharmacology CoreU54AT008909 · NCCIH · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI PAINE, MARY F · 2015 to 2024
$22.4M
NCCIH NIH HHS U54 AT008909
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A challenge that must be addressed when conducting studies with complex natural products is how to evaluate their complexity and variability. Traditional methods of quantifying a single or a small range of metabolites may not capture the full chemical complexity of multiple samples. Different metabolomics approaches were evaluated to discern how they facilitated comparison of the chemical composition of commercial green tea [Camellia sinensis (L.) Kuntze] products, with the goal of capturing the variability of commercially used products and selecting representative products for in vitro or clinical evaluation. Three metabolomic-related methods-untargeted ultraperformance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS), targeted UPLC-MS, and untargeted, quantitative

Indexed as

Camellia sinensisChromatography, High Pressure LiquidDietary SupplementsMetabolomicsMolecular StructurePlant LeavesTeaTea

Identifiers

PMID28453261
PMCPMC5469520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.