Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28452563›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of radiology2017

Adaptation and validation of a commercial head phantom for cranial radiosurgery dosimetry end-to-end audit.

Alexis Dimitriadis, Antony L Palmer, Russell A S Thomas, Andrew Nisbet, Catharine H Clark

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of radiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The role of dosimetry audit in achieving high quality radiotherapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2018
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alexis Dimitriadis1 Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4507-0734
Antony L Palmer1 Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
Russell A S Thomas3 Radiation Dosimetry Group, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, UK.
Andrew Nisbet1 Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
Catharine H Clark1 Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo adapt and validate an anthropomorphic head phantom for use in a cranial radiosurgery audit.

methodsTwo bespoke inserts were produced for the phantom: one for providing the target and organ at risk for delineation and the other for performing dose measurements. The inserts were tested to assess their positional accuracy. A basic treatment plan dose verification with an ionization chamber was performed to establish a baseline accuracy for the phantom and beam model. The phantom and inserts were then used to perform dose verification measurements of a radiosurgery plan. The dose was measured with alanine pellets, EBT extended dose film and a plastic scintillation detector (PSD).

resultsBoth inserts showed reproducible positioning (±0.5 mm) and good positional agreement between them (±0.6 mm). The basic treatment plan measurements showed agreement to the treatment planning system (TPS) within 0.5%. Repeated film measurements showed consistent gamma passing rates with good agreement to the TPS. For 2%-2 mm global gamma, the mean passing rate was 96.7% and the variation in passing rates did not exceed 2.1%. The alanine pellets and PSD showed good agreement with the TPS (-0.1% and 0.3% dose difference in the target) and good agreement with each other (within 1%).

conclusionThe adaptations to the phantom showed acceptable accuracies. The presence of alanine and PSD do not affect film measurements significantly, enabling simultaneous measurements by all three detectors. Advances in knowledge: A novel method for thorough end-to-end test of radiosurgery, with capability to incorporate all steps of the clinical pathway in a time-efficient and reproducible manner, suitable for a national audit.

Indexed as

HeadPhantoms, ImagingRadiosurgeryEquipment DesignHumansRadiometryRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted

Identifiers

PMID28452563
PMCPMC5602186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.