Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28452020›Full record

Article3 Biotech2017

Pectin from muskmelon (Cucumis melo var. reticulatus) peels: extraction optimization and physicochemical properties.

Chandrasekaran Muthukumaran, Loganathan Banupriya, Somasundharam Harinee, Sivagurunathan Sivaranjani, Govindasamy Sharmila, Vinayagam Rajasekar, Narasimhan Manoj Kumar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in 3 Biotech, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chandrasekaran MuthukumaranBioprocess Laboratory, Department of Industrial Biotechnology, Government College of Technology, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu, 641 013, India. biopearl1981@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3104-835X
Loganathan BanupriyaBioprocess Laboratory, Department of Industrial Biotechnology, Government College of Technology, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu, 641 013, India.
Somasundharam HarineeBioprocess Laboratory, Department of Industrial Biotechnology, Government College of Technology, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu, 641 013, India.
Sivagurunathan SivaranjaniBioprocess Laboratory, Department of Industrial Biotechnology, Government College of Technology, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu, 641 013, India.
Govindasamy SharmilaBioprocess Laboratory, Department of Industrial Biotechnology, Government College of Technology, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu, 641 013, India.
Vinayagam RajasekarBioprocess Laboratory, Department of Industrial Biotechnology, Government College of Technology, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu, 641 013, India.
Narasimhan Manoj KumarDepartment of Genetic Engineering, SRM University, Kattankulathur, Tamilnadu, 603 203, India.
Department of Biotechnology · INSRM Institute of Science and Technology · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pectin derived from plant waste sources is currently focused as an economical and eco-friendly approach. Optimization of pectin extraction from muskmelon peel by response surface methodology (RSM) was investigated in this study. Box-Behnken Design (BBD) was used to identify the optimal level of the extraction variables such as time, pH and temperature. A second-order model equation for pectin extraction was obtained from multiple regression analysis of experimental data with the correlation coefficient (R

Indexed as

ExtractionMuskmelonOptimizationPectinPseudoplasticRSM

Identifiers

PMID28452020
PMCPMC5428089
OpenAlexW2609158015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.