Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28451966›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2017

Phenotypic characterisation of breast cancer: the role of CDC42.

Eleni Chrysanthou, Kylie L Gorringe, Chitra Joseph, Madeleine Craze, Christopher C Nolan, Maria Diez-Rodriguez, Andrew R Green, Emad A Rakha, Ian O Ellis, Abhik Mukherjee

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Characterization of FGD5 Expression in Primary Breast Cancers and Lymph Node Metastases.The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Eleni ChrysanthouDivision of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham and Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, City Hospital Campus, Nottingham, NG5 1PB, UK.
Kylie L GorringeCancer Genomics Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
Chitra JosephDivision of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham and Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, City Hospital Campus, Nottingham, NG5 1PB, UK.
Madeleine CrazeDivision of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham and Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, City Hospital Campus, Nottingham, NG5 1PB, UK.
Christopher C NolanDivision of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham and Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, City Hospital Campus, Nottingham, NG5 1PB, UK.
Maria Diez-RodriguezDivision of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham and Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, City Hospital Campus, Nottingham, NG5 1PB, UK.
Andrew R GreenDivision of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham and Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, City Hospital Campus, Nottingham, NG5 1PB, UK.
Emad A RakhaDivision of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham and Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, City Hospital Campus, Nottingham, NG5 1PB, UK.
Ian O EllisDivision of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham and Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, City Hospital Campus, Nottingham, NG5 1PB, UK.
Abhik MukherjeeDivision of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham and Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, City Hospital Campus, Nottingham, NG5 1PB, UK. Abhik.Mukherjee@nottingham.ac.uk.
University of Nottingham · GBNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe molecular landscape of breast cancer (BC), especially of the Luminal A subtype, remains to be fully delineated. Transcriptomic data show that Luminal A tumours are enriched for aberrant expression of genes in the cell division control 42 homolog (CDC42) pathway. This study aims to investigate the protein expression of CDC42 in BC and assess its clinicopathological significance.

methodsExpression of CDC42 protein was examined by immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays in a well-characterised cohort of 895 early-stage (I-IIIa) primary invasive BCs.

resultsCDC42 expression was observed in both the cytoplasm and the nucleus of BC cells. High nuclear CDC42 expression demonstrated a significant correlation with ER-positive, low-grade tumours and was more common in the lobular histological subtype (all p < 0.001). In contrast, cytoplasmic CDC42 showed increased expression in the ductal subtype (p < 0.001) and correlated with negative prognostic features such as larger size, higher grade (p < 0.05) and higher Ki67 labelling index (p = 0.001). Nuclear CDC42 expression was associated with a longer BC-specific survival in all cases (p = 0.025) and in luminal ER-positive tumours (p = 0.011). In multivariate analyses including size, grade, lymph node stage and intrinsic subtype, CDC42 was an independent prognostic factor (p = 0.032).

conclusionThe results indicate that CDC42 is an important molecule in luminal BC, with prognostic significance.

Indexed as

Up-RegulationBreast Neoplasmscdc42 GTP-Binding ProteinCell NucleusCytoplasmFemaleHumansNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm StagingPrognosisReceptors, EstrogenSignal TransductionSurvival AnalysisTissue Array Analysiscdc42 GTP-Binding ProteinCDC42 protein, humanReceptors, EstrogenCDC42ImmunohistochemistryLuminal breast cancerPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID28451966
PMCPMC5487723
OpenAlexW2608999741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.