Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28451911›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2017

Effective patient-provider communication about sexual concerns in breast cancer: a qualitative study.

Jennifer Barsky Reese, Mary Catherine Beach, Katherine Clegg Smith, Elissa T Bantug, Kristen E Casale, Laura S Porter, Sharon L Bober, James A Tulsky, Mary B Daly, Stephen J Lepore

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Nurses' attitudes toward addressing sexual health in their professional practice within cancer care: a Danish cross-sectional study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Developing a patient-centered educational video series on sexual health for women with breast cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Breaking the silence: the role of sexual communication on quality of life in women with cervical cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Clinical Practice Strategies to Address Sexual Health in Female Cancer Survivors.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer Barsky ReeseCancer Prevention and Control Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Ave., 4th Floor, Young Pavilion, Philadelphia, PA, 19111, USA. Jennifer.Reese@fccc.edu.
Mary Catherine BeachDepartment of Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 2024 E. Monument St., Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Katherine Clegg SmithDepartment of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 N. Broadway, Hampton House 726, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Elissa T BantugJohns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, EB-1650 Orleans St CRB-1 189, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
Kristen E CasaleCancer Prevention and Control Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Ave., 4th Floor, Young Pavilion, Philadelphia, PA, 19111, USA.
Laura S PorterDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, DUMC 90399, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.
Sharon L BoberDepartment of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Shields-Warren 320, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
James A TulskyDepartment of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, DA-2016A, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Mary B DalyDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Ave., 4th Floor, Young Pavilion, Philadelphia, PA, 19111, USA.
Stephen J LeporeDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, College of Public Health, Temple University, 1301 Cecil B. Moore Ave., Ritter Annex, 9th Floor, Philadelphia, PA, 19122, USA.
Fox Chase Cancer Center · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USJohns Hopkins University · USDuke Medical Center · USSidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center · USTemple University · US

Funding

WORD PROCESSING CENTER--COREP30CA006927 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI CHARNITA M. ZEIGLER-JOHNSON · 1985 to 2026
$138.8M
Communication Quality and Patient Outcomes in HIV/AIDS and Substance AbuseK24DA037804 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BEACH, MARY CATHERINE · 2015 to 2019
$923k
Phone-Based Intimacy Enhancement Intervention for Couples facing Breast CancerR21CA191354 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI REESE, JENNIFER BARSKY · 2015 to 2016
$345k
American Cancer Society MRSG-14-031-CPPBNCI NIH HHS P30 CA006927NCI NIH HHS P30CA006927NCI NIH HHS R21 CA191354NCI NIH HHS R21CA191354NIDA NIH HHS K24 DA037804
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBreast cancer patients commonly experience sexual concerns, yet rarely discuss them with clinicians. The study examined patient and provider experiences and preferences related to communication about breast cancer-related sexual concerns with the goal of informing intervention development.

methodsPatient data (n = 28) were derived from focus groups and interviews with partnered and unpartnered women treated for breast cancer reporting sexual concerns. Provider data (n = 11) came from interviews with breast cancer oncologists and nurse practitioners. Patient and provider data were analyzed separately using the framework method of qualitative analysis.

resultsFindings revealed individual and institutional barriers to effective communication about sexual concerns and highlighted key communication facilitators (e.g., a positive patient-provider relationship, patient communication as a driver of provider communication, and vice versa). Patients expressed preferences for open, collaborative communication; providers expressed preferences for focused intervention targets (identifying concerns, offering resources/referrals) and convenient format. A model of effective communication of sexual concerns was developed to inform communication interventions.

conclusionsFindings suggest that to improve patient-provider communication about sexual concerns, knowledge and skills-based interventions that activate patients and that equip providers for effective discussions about sexual concerns are needed, as are institutional changes that could incentivize such discussions.

Indexed as

CommunicationPhysician-Patient RelationsAdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsFemaleFocus GroupsHumansInterpersonal RelationsMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSexual BehaviorSexual Dysfunction, PhysiologicalSexual Dysfunctions, PsychologicalSexualitySexual PartnersBreast cancerCommunicationPatient-provider communicationQualitative researchSexuality

Identifiers

PMID28451911
PMCPMC5803445
OpenAlexW2609568217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.