Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28451811›Full record

Trial reportCardiovascular and interventional radiology2017

Prospective Clinical and Pharmacological Evaluation of the Delcath System's Second-Generation (GEN2) Hemofiltration System in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion with Melphalan.

Eleonora M de Leede, Mark C Burgmans, T Susanna Meijer, Christian H Martini, Fred G J Tijl, Jaap Vuyk, Arian R van Erkel, Cornelis J H van der Velde, Ellen Kapiteijn, Alexander L Vahrmeijer

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Heparin reversal with protamine sulfate after Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion (PHP): is less more?Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Eleonora M de LeedeDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Mark C BurgmansDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands. m.c.burgmans@lumc.nl.
T Susanna MeijerDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Christian H MartiniDepartment of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Fred G J TijlDepartment of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Jaap VuykDepartment of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Arian R van ErkelDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Cornelis J H van der VeldeDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Ellen KapiteijnDepartment of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Alexander L VahrmeijerDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Leiden University · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPercutaneous hepatic perfusion (PHP) with melphalan is an effective treatment for patients with hepatic metastases, but associated with high rates of bone marrow depression. To reduce systemic toxicity, improvements have been made to the filtration system. In pre-clinical studies, the Delcath System's GEN2 filter was superior to the first-generation filters. In this clinical study, we analysed the pharmacokinetics and toxicity of PHP using the new GEN2 filter. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Starting February 2014, two prospective phase II studies were initiated in patients with hepatic metastases from ocular melanoma or colorectal cancer. In 10 PHP procedures performed in the first 7 enrolled patients, blood samples were obtained to determine filter efficiency and systemic drug exposure. PHP was performed with melphalan 3 mg/kg with a maximum of 220 mg. Complications were assessed according to CTCAE v4.03. Response was assessed according to RECIST 1.1.

resultsPharmacokinetic analysis of blood samples showed an overall filter efficiency of 86% (range 71.1-95.5%). The mean filter efficiency decreased from 95.4% 10 min after the start of melphalan infusion to 77.5% at the end of the procedure (p = 0.051). Bone marrow depression was seen after up to 80.0% of 10 procedures, but was self-limiting and mostly asymptomatic. No hypotension-related complications or procedure-related mortality occurred.

conclusionThe GEN2 filter has a higher melphalan filter efficiency compared to the first-generation filters and a more consistent performance. PHP with the GEN2 filter appears to have an acceptable safety profile, but this needs further validation in larger studies.

Indexed as

AdultAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingChemotherapy, Cancer, Regional PerfusionColorectal NeoplasmsEye NeoplasmsFemaleHemofiltrationHumansLiver NeoplasmsMaleMelanomaMelphalanMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingMelphalanCancerChemoembolisationColorectal cancerInterventional oncologyLiverUveal melanoma

Identifiers

PMID28451811
PMCPMC5554291
OpenAlexW4254394132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.