Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28451710›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2017

Thalamic inputs to dorsomedial striatum are involved in inhibitory control: evidence from the five-choice serial reaction time task in rats.

Jasjot Saund, Daniel Dautan, Claire Rostron, Gonzalo P Urcelay, Todor V Gerdjikov

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. The Contribution of Thalamic Nuclei in Salience Processing.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2021
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Cognitive Thalamus as a Gateway to Mental Representations.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jasjot SaundDepartment of Neuroscience, Psychology and Behaviour, University of Leicester, Leicester, LE1 9HN, UK.
Daniel DautanCenter for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers University, 197 University Ave, Newark, NJ, 07102, UK.
Claire RostronDepartment of Life, Health and Chemical Sciences, Open University, Milton Keynes, MK7 6AA, UK.
Gonzalo P UrcelayDepartment of Neuroscience, Psychology and Behaviour, University of Leicester, Leicester, LE1 9HN, UK.
Todor V GerdjikovDepartment of Neuroscience, Psychology and Behaviour, University of Leicester, Leicester, LE1 9HN, UK. tvg3@le.ac.uk.
University of Leicester · GBRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USThe Open University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleCorticostriatal circuits are widely implicated in the top-down control of attention including inhibitory control and behavioural flexibility. However, recent neurophysiological evidence also suggests a role for thalamic inputs to striatum in behaviours related to salient, reward-paired cues.

objectivesHere, we used designer receptors exclusively activated by designer drugs (DREADDs) to investigate the role of parafascicular (Pf) thalamic inputs to the dorsomedial striatum (DMS) using the five-choice serial reaction time task (5CSRTT) in rats.

methodsThe 5CSRTT requires sustained attention in order to detect spatially and temporally distributed visual cues and provides measures of inhibitory control related to impulsivity (premature responses) and compulsivity (perseverative responses). Rats underwent bilateral Pf injections of the DREADD vector, AAV2-CaMKIIa-HA-hM4D(Gi)-IRES-mCitrine. The DREADD agonist, clozapine N-oxide (CNO; 1 μl bilateral; 3 μM) or vehicle, was injected into DMS 1 h before behavioural testing. Task parameters were manipulated to increase attention load or reduce stimulus predictability respectively.

resultsWe found that inhibition of the Pf-DMS projection significantly increased perseverative responses when stimulus predictability was reduced but had no effect on premature responses or response accuracy, even under increased attentional load. Control experiments showed no effects on locomotor activity in an open field.

conclusionsThese results complement previous lesion work in which the DMS and orbitofrontal cortex were similarly implicated in perseverative responses and suggest a specific role for thalamostriatal inputs in inhibitory control.

Indexed as

AnimalsAttentionChoice BehaviorClozapineCorpus StriatumCuesInhibition, PsychologicalMaleNeural PathwaysRatsRats, Long-EvansReaction TimeRewardSynaptic TransmissionThalamusClozapineclozapine N-oxide5-choice serial reaction time taskDorsomedial striatumParafascicular thalamic nucleusThalamostriatal pathway

Identifiers

PMID28451710
PMCPMC5537317
OpenAlexW2609610197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.