Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28451512›Full record

ReviewGlobal spine journal2017

Spinal Compression Fracture Management: A Review of Current Treatment Strategies and Possible Future Avenues.

Ivo K Genev, Matthew K Tobin, Saher P Zaidi, Sajeel R Khan, Farid M L Amirouche, Ankit I Mehta

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Global spine journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Re-evaluating vertebral height restoration assessment in osteoporotic compression fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Personalized Approaches to Spine Surgery.International journal of spine surgery · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Retrospective Review of 181 Patients with Pathologic Vertebral Compression Fractures.Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ivo K GenevDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United Sates.
Matthew K TobinDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United Sates.
Saher P ZaidiDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United Sates.
Sajeel R KhanDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United Sates.
Farid M L AmiroucheDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United Sates.
Ankit I MehtaDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United Sates.
University of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designNarrative review.

objectiveDespite the numerous treatment options for vertebral compression fractures, a consensus opinion for the management of patients with these factures has not been established. This review is meant to provide an up-to-date overview of the most common treatment strategies for compression fractures and to suggest possible routes for the development of clearer treatment guidelines.

methodsA comprehensive database search of PubMed was performed. All results from the past 30 years were obtained and evaluated based on title and abstract. The full length of relevant studies was analyzed for level of evidence, and the strongest studies were used in this review.

resultsThe major treatment strategies for patients with compression fractures are conservative pain management and vertebral augmentation. Despite potential adverse effects, medical management, including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, calcitonin, teriparatide, and bisphosphonates, remains the first-line therapy for patients. Evidence suggests that vertebral augmentation, especially some of the newer procedures, have the potential to dramatically reduce pain and improve quality of life. At this time, balloon-assisted kyphoplasty is the procedure with the most evidence of support.

conclusionsBased on current literature, it is evident that there is a lack of standard of care for patients with vertebral compression fractures, which is either due to lack of evidence that a procedure is successful or due to serious adverse effects encountered with prolonged treatment. For a consensus to be reached, prospective clinical trials need to be formulated with potential new biomarkers to assess efficacy of treatment strategies.

Indexed as

finite element analysiskyphoplastypain managementspinal compression fracturevertebral augmentationvertebroplasty

Identifiers

PMID28451512
PMCPMC5400164
OpenAlexW2337592461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.