ArticleMolecular and clinical oncology2017
Erlotinib as second- or third-line treatment in elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: Keio Lung Oncology Group Study 001 (KLOG001).
Article in Molecular and clinical oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The Relationship Between Short-Term Surrogate Endpoint Indicators and mPFS and mOS in Clinical Trials of Malignant Tumors: A Case Study of Approved Molecular Targeted Drugs for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in China.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Pooled it
- Eye, hepatobiliary, and renal disorders of erlotinib in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis.PloS one · 2020Pooled it
- The Prognostic Value ofMolecular imaging and radionuclide therapy · 2022Article
- Review
- Real-world assessment of afatinib for patients with EGFR-positive non-small cell lung cancer.Investigational new drugs · 2020Article
- Impact of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors.Investigational new drugs · 2020Article
- Impact ofCancer management and research · 2019Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of erlotinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), as second- or third-line treatment for elderly Japanese patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The patients eligible for this phase II trial were aged ≥70 years, had stage III/IV or recurrent NSCLC, and had previously received 1 or 2 chemotherapy regimens that did not include EGFR-TKIs. The patients received erlotinib at a dose of 150 mg/day. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR), and the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicity. A total of 38 patients with a median age of 76 years were enrolled. The majority of the patients were men (66%), had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 1 (58%), stage IV disease (66%) and adenocarcinoma (74%). Of the 35 patients, 13 (34%) had tumors with EGFR mutations. The ORR was 26.3% (95% confidence interval: 12.1-40.5%) and the disease control rate was 47.4%. The median PFS was 3.7 months and the median OS was 17.3 months. The grade 3 adverse events observed included rash (13%), diarrhea (5%), interstitial pneumonitis (5%), anorexia (3%) and gastrointestinal bleeding (3%). Grade 4 or 5 adverse events were not observed. The median OS did not differ significantly between patients aged <75 years (14.9 months) and those aged ≥75 years (19.0 months; P=0.226). Therefore, erlotinib was found to be effective and well-tolerated in elderly patients with previously treated NSCLC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.