ArticleMolecular and clinical oncology2017
Response to regorafenib at an initial dose of 120 mg as salvage therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer.
Article in Molecular and clinical oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- A meta-analysis of safety and efficacy of regorafenib for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.Medicine · 2018Pooled it
- Trial
- Appropriate dose of regorafenib based on body weight of colorectal cancer patients: a retrospective cohort study.BMC cancer · 2023Article
- Therapeutic Potential of Regorafenib in Cisplatin-Resistant Bladder Cancer with High Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition and Stemness Properties.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Trifluridine/Tipiracil and Regorafenib in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Study at a Tertiary Oncology Center.The oncologist · 2021Article
- Impact of sarcopenia in patients with advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer treated with regorafenib.International journal of clinical oncology · 2021Article
- Pazopanib as salvage therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma with hypercalcemic crisis and renal insufficiency: a case report and literature review.Translational cancer research · 2020Article
- Practical considerations in the use of regorafenib in metastatic colorectal cancer.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2020Review
- Article
- Comparison of Standard Initial Dose and Reduced Initial Dose Regorafenib for Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Targeted oncology · 2019Observational
- Oncologic Outcomes in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer with Regorafenib with FOLFIRI as a Third- or Fourth-Line Setting.Translational oncology · 2019Article
- The use of regorafenib for patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer in clinical practice.OncoTargets and therapy · 2019Article
- Retrospective study of regorafenib and trifluridine/tipiracil efficacy as a third-line or later chemotherapy regimen for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.Oncology letters · 2018Article
- Incidence and risk of hematologic toxicities in cancer patients treated with regorafenib.Oncotarget · 2017Article
- Incidence and risk of regorafenib-induced hepatotoxicity.Oncotarget · 2017Article
- Practice patterns and outcomes with the use of regorafenib in metastatic colorectal cancer: Results from the Regorafenib in Metastatic colorectal cancer - An Indian exploratory analysis study.South Asian journal of cancerArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Regorafenib (Reg) is an oral multikinase inhibitor that has achieved improved overall survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in the salvage therapy setting. However, Reg is difficult to manage and determine the optimal dose due to adverse events (AEs). The objective of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the clinical benefit and determine the optimal dose of Reg in mCRC patients. A total of 20 mCRC patients were enrolled in this retrospective study. Initially, 8 patients who received a starting dose of 160 mg Reg (160 mg group) once a day were evaluated; however, they were unable to continue with the initial dose of 160 mg due to grade 3 adverse events (AEs), such as hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) and small intestinal hemorrhage. Furthermore, 2 of the 8 patients refused subsequent treatment due to HFSR and the remaining 6 patients received a dose reduction from 160 to 120 mg Reg. A reduced dose of 120 mg Reg was also assessed with our dose modification method in 12 patients (120 mg group). The optimal response of the 160 and 120 mg group patients was 0.0 and 8.3% (1/12), respectively. In the 160 mg group, 3 patients exhibited stable disease (SD). Surprisingly, among the the 120 mg group patients 1 exhibited partial response (PR) and 6 had SD. The PR case displayed shrinkage of the local recurrence and morphological changes. One of the SD cases exhibited formation of a cavity in the lung metastasis, with intralesional morphological changes of the liver metastasis. The duration of the treatment in the PR case and the SD case with the cavitation was 6.5 months (9 cycles) and 5 months (6 cycles), respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 77 days (range, 30-230+ days) and the median overall survival (OS) was 204 days (range, 53-511+ days). The final date of the follow-up period was July 31, 2016. The 160 mg group was associated with a 25% (3/8) incidence of HFSR, 12.5% (1/8) of small intestinal hemorrhage and 12.5% (1/8) of anemia and thrombocytopenia; the AEs were grade >3. The 120 mg group was associated with an incidence of only 8.3% (1/12) of grade >3 hypertension. Thus, the 120 mg group experienced lower treatment-related toxicity compared with the 160 mg group. Despite a reduced initial dose of Reg, a significant effect was observed, with 1 PR and 6 favorable SD cases, with good tolerability. Therefore, an initial dose modification of 120 mg Reg is recommended as an alternative strategy for the treatment of mCRC in the salvage setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.