ArticleMolecular and clinical oncology2017
Article in Molecular and clinical oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Image enhanced colonoscopy: updates and prospects-a review.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2023Review
- New application of endocytoscope for histopathological diagnosis of colorectal lesions.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2022Article
- Clinical Efficacy of Endocytoscopy for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.Clinical endoscopy · 2021Article
- Endocytoscopy: technology and clinical application in the lower GI tract.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The pathological determination of desmoplastic reaction (DR) in colorectal carcinoma is useful for predicting extensive submucosal invasion. The aim of the present study was to determine the usefulness of endocytoscopy (EC) in detecting DR. A total of 72 cases of colorectal cancer with submucosal invasion (EC classification, EC3b) were evaluated. The utility of fine granular structure (FGS) observed via EC for the prediction of the presence of DR in the most superficial tumor layers was assessed. Of the 72 lesions, 26 were positive for FGS, and the majority of these lesions (23/26, 88.5%) exhibited a DR, indicating a significant association. The overall accuracy of the identification of FGS via EC that was predictive of a DR was 87.3%. The presence of FGS detected by EC was significantly associated with the presence of a DR, suggesting the clinical usefulness of EC in planning treatment for colon cancer with submucosal invasion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.