ArticleBiomedical reports2017
Myofilament function and body mass index.
Article in Biomedical reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Body mass is reported to influence myocardial performance. Recent studies have emphasised the importance of negative inotropic adipocyte-derived factors and their impact on cardiac contractile function. However, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. We aimed to determine whether body mass impacts cardiac force development on the level of the contractile apparatus. We examined the influence of body mass index (BMI) (3 groups: group I >25, group II 25-30, group III >30) on the myocardial performance of skinned muscle fibres. Right atrial tissue preparations of 70 patients undergoing aortocoronary bypass operation (CABG, 48 patients, group a) and aortic valve replacement (AVR, 22 patients, group b) were obtained. The fibres were exposed to a gradual increase in the calcium concentration, and the force values were recorded. The statistical analysis was performed using Pearson's correlation (P<0.05 significant). A BMI >30 (group III) was associated with less force (mean force 1.58±0.1 mN, P=0.02, max force 2.24±0.17 mN, P=0.02 vs. group II (mean force 1.8±0.3 mN, P=0.04, max force 2.59±0.2 mN, P=0.03) and group I (mean force 1.8±0.1 mN, P=0,03, max force 2.62±0.3 mN, P=0.03). Dividing the groups in the post-surgical procedure, the impact of BMI on force development in group III was more intense in the CABG group compared to the AVR group: 2.0±0.2 mN vs. 2.4±0.1 mN, P=0.04. In accordance with the literature, a BMI >30 is associated with reduced force capacities. Additionally, the underlying cardiac disease may aggravate the impact of weight on cardiac force. Further studies are needed to evaluate the clinical relevance of this experimental observation and the potential consequences for the treatment of cardiac function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.