ReviewCell & bioscience2017
Plant genome editing with TALEN and CRISPR.
Review in Cell & bioscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 93 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
93 citing papers in PubMed.
- CRISPR-Cas13-based amplification-free detection of three quarantine-significant sugarcane viruses.Plant cell reports · 2026Article
- Genome Editing Approaches in Flax (International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Genome-wide identification, structural characterization, and gene expression analysis of the MYB transcription factor family in faba bean (Vicia faba L.).BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Advances in gene editing for legume improvement: technologies, progress, and prospects.Frontiers in genome editing · 2026Review
- Exploring the Role of Pheromones and CRISPR/Cas9 in the Behavioral and Olfactory Mechanisms ofInsects · 2025Review
- The evolving landscape of precise DNA insertion in plants.Nature communications · 2025Review
- The use of transgenic animals for xenotransplantation: An update.Animal models and experimental medicine · 2025Review
- CRISPR-Cas applications in agriculture and plant research.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2025Review
- Genome editing in maize and sorghum: A comprehensive review of CRISPR/Cas9 and emerging technologies.The plant genome · 2025Review
- Review
- Genetic engineering in diatoms: advances and prospects.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025Review
- Identification, charectrization and genetic transformation of lignin and pectin polysaccharides through CRISPR/Cas9 in Nicotiana tobacum.Functional & integrative genomics · 2024Article
- CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing technique to control fall armyworm (Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2024Review
- Recent Advances in Tomato Gene Editing.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Plant Adaptation and Tolerance to Heat Stress: Advance Approaches and Future Aspects.Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening · 2024Review
- Genetic engineering and genome editing technologies as catalyst for Africa's food security: the case of plant biotechnology in Nigeria.Frontiers in genome editing · 2024Review
- Advancing crop disease resistance through genome editing: a promising approach for enhancing agricultural production.Frontiers in genome editing · 2024Review
- The legal aspect of the current use of genetically modified organisms in Kenya, Tanzania, and Uganda.GM crops & food · 2023Review
- Genome Editing and Improvement of Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Crop Plants.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Insights into the Transcriptomics of Crop Wild Relatives to Unravel the Salinity Stress Adaptive Mechanisms.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genome editing promises giant leaps forward in advancing biotechnology, agriculture, and basic research. The process relies on the use of sequence specific nucleases (SSNs) to make DNA double stranded breaks at user defined genomic loci, which are subsequently repaired by two main DNA repair pathways: non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) and homology directed repair (HDR). NHEJ can result in frameshift mutations that often create genetic knockouts. These knockout lines are useful for functional and reverse genetic studies but also have applications in agriculture. HDR has a variety of applications as it can be used for gene replacement, gene stacking, and for creating various fusion proteins. In recent years, transcription activator-like effector nucleases and clustered regularly interspaced palindromic repeats (CRISPR) and CRISPR associated protein 9 or CRISPR from Prevotella and Francisella 1 have emerged as the preferred SSNs for research purposes. Here, we review their applications in plant research, discuss current limitations, and predict future research directions in plant genome editing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.