Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28451110›Full record

ArticleChemical science2016

Mass spectrometric snapshots for electrochemical reactions.

Ran Qiu, Xin Zhang, Hai Luo, Yuanhua Shao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Mild and efficient coupling reactions enabled byCatalysis science & technology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Dual Metal Electrolysis in Theta Capillary for Lipid Analysis.International journal of mass spectrometry · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Absolute Quantitation of Oxidizable Peptides by Coulometric Mass Spectrometry.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ran QiuBeijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences , College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering , Peking University , Beijing 100871 , China . Email: hluo@pku.edu.cn ; Email: yhshao@pku.edu.cn.
Xin ZhangBeijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences , College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering , Peking University , Beijing 100871 , China . Email: hluo@pku.edu.cn ; Email: yhshao@pku.edu.cn.
Hai LuoBeijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences , College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering , Peking University , Beijing 100871 , China . Email: hluo@pku.edu.cn ; Email: yhshao@pku.edu.cn.
Yuanhua ShaoBeijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences , College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering , Peking University , Beijing 100871 , China . Email: hluo@pku.edu.cn ; Email: yhshao@pku.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A hybrid ultramicroelectrode containing one micro-carbon electrode and one empty micro-channel was employed to be a micro-electrochemical cell and a mass spectrometric nanospray emitter. This setup can combine MS with an electrode directly and provide

Identifiers

PMID28451110
PMCPMC5355862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.