ArticleChemical science2016
Atmospheric-pressure ionization and fragmentation of peptides by solution-cathode glow discharge.
Article in Chemical science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Negative Gaseous Ions in Positive-Voltage Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry.Analytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Landmark Publications in Analytical Atomic Spectrometry: Fundamentals and Instrumentation Development.Applied spectroscopy · 2025Article
- Solution Cathode Glow Discharge Coupled to Atmospheric Pressure Chemical Ionization for Elemental Detection of S and P in Organic Compounds.Spectrochimica acta. Part B, Atomic spectroscopy · 2024Article
- Nested-channel for on-demand alternation between electrospray ionization regimes.Chemical science · 2020Article
- Modeling plasmas in analytical chemistry-an example of cross-fertilization.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2020Review
- Automatic Analyte-Ion Recognition and Background Removal for Ambient Mass-Spectrometric Data Based on Cross-Correlation.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Modern "-omics" (
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.