Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28450946›Full record

ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2017

Effect of vacuum sealing drainage on the expression of VEGF and miRNA-17-5p in seawater-immersed blast-injury wounds.

Fen Yang, Bing Shi, Ling Cao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fen YangDepartment of Burns and Plastic Surgery, Bayannur City Hospital, Bayannur, Inner Mongolia 015000, P.R. China.
Bing ShiDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The 309th Hospital of PLA, Beijing 100091, P.R. China.
Ling CaoDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The 309th Hospital of PLA, Beijing 100091, P.R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to compare and observe the expression levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and miRNA-17-5p during the treatment of seawater-immersed blast-injury wounds (SIBIW) under different conditions of vacuum sealing drainage (VSD), and to identify the optimized range of VSD treatment and partially explain its mechanisms. The bilateral hips and scapulae of experimental pigs (weight, 25-30 kg) were subjected to blast-injury wounds, followed by the seawater immersion. The animals then underwent conventional dressing treatment under 120, 180 and 240 mmHg VSD. Visual observation, in addition to histological, immunohistochemical and molecular biological techniques were applied to compare and observe the extent of wound healing and expression levels of VEGF and miRNA-17-5p. The wound healing of the VSD treatment group was improved compared with the control group, with 120 mmHg negative pressure producing the most marked effect. miR-17-5p expression was detected in the SIBIW granulation tissues. There was significant difference between each VSD treatment group and control group at each time point (P<0.05). Thus, the present results show that miR-17-5p can be expressed in SIBIW granulation tissues, and this effect is most evident under 120 mmHg negative pressure, which may inform the optimized negative range for the treatment of SIBIW.

Indexed as

blast injurymiRNAseawater immersionvacuum sealing drainagevascular endothelial growth factor

Identifiers

PMID28450946
PMCPMC5403197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.