Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28450890›Full record

ArticleBioData mining2017

Multi-class computational evolution: development, benchmark evaluation and application to RNA-Seq biomarker discovery.

Nathaniel M Crabtree, Jason H Moore, John F Bowyer, Nysia I George

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioData mining, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Nextcast: A software suite to analyse and model toxicogenomics data.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nathaniel M CrabtreeBioinformatics, Department of Information Science, University of Arkansas at Little Rock and University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Joint Bioinformatics Graduate Program, Little Rock, AR USA.
Jason H MooreDivision of Informatics, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Institute for Biomedical Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6021 USA.
John F BowyerDivision of Neurotoxicology, National Center for Toxicological Research, FDA, Jefferson, AR USA.
Nysia I GeorgeDivision of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, National Center for Toxicological Research, FDA, Jefferson, AR USA.

Funding

Biomedical Computing and Informatics Strategies for Infectious Disease ResearchR01AI116794 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MOORE, JASON H. · 2016 to 2020
$2.9M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI116794
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA computational evolution system (CES) is a knowledge discovery engine that can identify subtle, synergistic relationships in large datasets. Pareto optimization allows CESs to balance accuracy with model complexity when evolving classifiers. Using Pareto optimization, a CES is able to identify a very small number of features while maintaining high classification accuracy. A CES can be designed for various types of data, and the user can exploit expert knowledge about the classification problem in order to improve discrimination between classes. These characteristics give CES an advantage over other classification and feature selection algorithms, particularly when the goal is to identify a small number of highly relevant, non-redundant biomarkers. Previously, CESs have been developed only for binary class datasets. In this study, we developed a multi-class CES.

resultsThe multi-class CES was compared to three common feature selection and classification algorithms: support vector machine (SVM), random k-nearest neighbor (RKNN), and random forest (RF). The algorithms were evaluated on three distinct multi-class RNA sequencing datasets. The comparison criteria were run-time, classification accuracy, number of selected features, and stability of selected feature set (as measured by the Tanimoto distance). The performance of each algorithm was data-dependent. CES performed best on the dataset with the smallest sample size, indicating that CES has a unique advantage since the accuracy of most classification methods suffer when sample size is small.

conclusionThe multi-class extension of CES increases the appeal of its application to complex, multi-class datasets in order to identify important biomarkers and features.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceBiomarker discoveryClassificationData miningEvolutionary algorithmFeature selectionGenetic programmingMachine learningMulti-class

Identifiers

PMID28450890
PMCPMC5404302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.