Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28450449›Full record

ArticleCBE life sciences education2017

A Call to Develop Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experiences (CUREs) for Nonmajors Courses.

Cissy J Ballen, Jessamina E Blum, Sara Brownell, Sadie Hebert, James Hewlett, Joanna R Klein, Erik A McDonald, Denise L Monti, Stephen C Nold, Krista E Slemmons and 2 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CBE life sciences education, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Community involvement in addressing the antibiotic crisis.Journal of microbiology & biology education · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Cissy J BallenDepartment of Biology Teaching and Learning, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455 balle027@umn.edu.
Jessamina E BlumDepartment of Biology Teaching and Learning, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455.
Sara BrownellSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281.
Sadie HebertDepartment of Biology Teaching and Learning, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455.
James HewlettDepartment of Science and Technology, Finger Lakes Community College, Canandaigua, NY 14424.
Joanna R KleinDepartment of Biology & Biochemistry, University of Northwestern, St. Paul, MN 55113.
Erik A McDonaldSchool of Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences, University of Washington, Tacoma, WA 98402.
Denise L MontiDepartment of Biology, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL 35233.
Stephen C NoldDepartment of Biology, University of Wisconsin-Stout, Menomonie, WI 54751.
Krista E SlemmonsDepartment of Biology, University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point, Stevens Point, WI 54481.
Paula A G SoneralDepartment of Biological Sciences, Bethel University, St. Paul, MN 55112.
Sehoya CotnerDepartment of Biology Teaching and Learning, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) for non-science majors (nonmajors) are potentially distinct from CUREs for developing scientists in their goals, learning objectives, and assessment strategies. While national calls to improve science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education have led to an increase in research revealing the positive effects of CUREs for science majors, less work has specifically examined whether nonmajors are impacted in the same way. To address this gap in our understanding, a working group focused on nonmajors CUREs was convened to discuss the following questions: 1) What are our laboratory-learning goals for nonmajors? 2) What are our research priorities to determine best practices for nonmajors CUREs? 3) How can we collaborate to define and disseminate best practices for nonmajors in CUREs? We defined three broad student outcomes of prime importance to the nonmajors CURE: improvement of scientific literacy skills, proscience attitudes, and evidence-based decision making. We evaluated the state of knowledge of best practices for nonmajors, and identified research priorities for the future. The report that follows is a summary of the conclusions and future directions from our discussion.

Indexed as

Educational MeasurementEngineeringHumansLearningMathematicsModels, EducationalResearchStudents

Identifiers

PMID28450449
PMCPMC5459265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.