3D T2-SPACE versus T2-FSE or T2 Gradient Recalled-Echo: Which Is the Best Sequence?

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

1. Accuracy of Noncontrast T2 SPACE in Active MS Cord Lesion Detection.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2023
   Article
2. The value of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional isotropic T2-weighted turbo spin-echo SPACE sequence in the diagnosis of patients with lumbosacral nerve root compression.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2021
   Article
3. Spinal vascular lesions: anatomy, imaging techniques and treatment.European journal of radiology open · 2021
   Review

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  2017
• Comment on
  Diagnostic Quality of 3D T2-SPACE Compared with T2-FSE in the Evaluation of Cervical Spine MRI Anatomy.2017

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as