Infants' inferences about language are social.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Similarity between an unfamiliar human and the owner affects dogs' preference for human partner when responding to an unsolvable problem.Learning & behavior · 2018
   Article
2. The early social significance of shared ritual actions.Cognition · 2018
   Article
3. Reply to Kinzler and Liberman: Neural correlate provides direct evidence that infant's social preferences are about information.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  Reply to Kinzler and Liberman: Neural correlate provides direct evidence that infant's social preferences are about information.2017
• Comment on
  Infants' preferences for native speakers are associated with an expectation of information.2016

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as