Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28450273›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2017

Importance-Performance Analysis of Personal Health Records in Taiwan: A Web-Based Survey.

Hsiao-Hsien Rau, Yi-Syuan Wu, Chi-Ming Chu, Fu-Chung Wang, Min-Huei Hsu, Chi-Wen Chang, Kang-Hua Chen, Yen-Liang Lee, Senyeong Kao, Yu-Lung Chiu and 4 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Importance-Performance Analysis of Health Perception among Korean Adolescents during the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Hsiao-Hsien RauGraduate Institute of Biomedical Informatics, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-7233-2085
Yi-Syuan WuAdministration Department, Healthconn Corp, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-9609-6489
Chi-Ming ChuSchool Of Public Health, National Defence Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-8563-1378
Fu-Chung WangNational Health Insurance Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-7830-6024
Min-Huei HsuGraduate Institute of Biomedical Informatics, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-3607-2463
Chi-Wen ChangSchool of Nursing, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Linkou, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-8718-7522
Kang-Hua ChenSchool of Nursing, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-9782-3633
Yen-Liang LeeGraduate Institute of Biomedical Informatics, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-3794-7404
Senyeong KaoSchool Of Public Health, National Defence Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-0209-240X
Yu-Lung ChiuSchool Of Public Health, National Defence Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-6963-2116
Hsyien-Chia WenSchool of Health Care Administration, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-5801-9490
Anis FuadDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Population Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0003-2303-5903
Chien-Yeh HsuGraduate Institute of Biomedical Informatics, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-8233-6461
Hung-Wen ChiuGraduate Institute of Biomedical Informatics, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-6919-8199

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmpowering personal health records (PHRs) provides basic human right, awareness, and intention for health promotion. As health care delivery changes toward patient-centered services, PHRs become an indispensable platform for consumers and providers. Recently, the government introduced "My health bank," a Web-based electronic medical records (EMRs) repository for consumers. However, it is not yet a PHR. To date, we do not have a platform that can let patients manage their own PHR.

objectiveThis study creates a vision of a value-added platform for personal health data analysis and manages their health record based on the contents of the "My health bank." This study aimed to examine consumer expectation regarding PHR, using the importance-performance analysis. The purpose of this study was to explore consumer perception regarding this type of a platform: it would try to identify the key success factors and important aspects by using the importance-performance analysis, and give some suggestions for future development based on it.

methodsThis is a cross-sectional study conducted in Taiwan. Web-based invitation to participate in this study was distributed through Facebook. Respondents were asked to watch an introductory movie regarding PHR before filling in the questionnaire. The questionnaire was focused on 2 aspects, including (1) system functions, and (2) system design and security and privacy. The questionnaire would employ 12 and 7 questions respectively. The questionnaire was designed following 5-points Likert scale ranging from 1 ("disagree strongly") to 5 ("Agree strongly"). Afterwards, the questionnaire data was sorted using IBM SPSS Statistics 21 for descriptive statistics and the importance-performance analysis.

resultsThis research received 350 valid questionnaires. Most respondents were female (219 of 350 participants, 62.6%), 21-30 years old (238 of 350 participants, 68.0%), with a university degree (228 of 350 participants, 65.1%). They were still students (195 out of 350 participants, 56.6%), with a monthly income of less than NT $30,000 (230 of 350 participants, 65.7%), and living in the North Taiwan (236 of 350 participants, 67.4%), with a good self-identified health status (171 of 350 participants, 48.9%). After performing the importance-performance analysis, we found the following: (1) instead of complex functions, people just want to have a platform that can let them integrate and manage their medical visit, health examination, and life behavior records; (2) they do not care whether their PHR is shared with others; and (3) most of the participants think the system security design is not important, but they also do not feel satisfied with the current security design.

conclusionsOverall, the issues receiving the most user attention were the system functions, circulation, integrity, ease of use, and continuity of the PHRs, data security, and privacy protection.

Indexed as

InternetSurveys and QuestionnairesAdultComputer SecurityCross-Sectional StudiesElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHealth StatusHumansIncomeMalePatient SatisfactionPrivacyReproducibility of ResultsTaiwanYoung Adultelectronic health recordshealth records, personalsurveys and questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID28450273
PMCPMC5427249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.