Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28450272›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2017

Evaluation of a Web-Based Tailored Nursing Intervention (TAVIE en m@rche) Aimed at Increasing Walking After an Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol.

John William Kayser, Sylvie Cossette, José Côté, Anne Bourbonnais, Margaret Purden, Martin Juneau, Jean-Francois Tanguay, Marie-Josée Simard, Jocelyn Dupuis, Jean G Diodati and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02617641 (Evaluation of a Web-Based Tailored Nursing Intervention), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02617641 nacompletednot on this map

Evaluation of a Web-Based Tailored Nursing Intervention (TAVIEenM@RCHE) Aimed at Increasing Walking in Patients After an Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorMontreal Heart InstituteRan2016 to 2017Enrolled60ConditionsAcute Coronary SyndromeArmsTAVIEenM@RCHE, Publicly available websites
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

John William KayserUniversité de Montréal, Faculty of Nursing, Montréal, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6109-6286
Sylvie CossetteUniversité de Montréal, Faculty of Nursing, Montréal, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5840-9122
José CôtéUniversité de Montréal, Faculty of Nursing, Montréal, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0617-2861
Anne BourbonnaisUniversité de Montréal, Faculty of Nursing, Montréal, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6823-4044
Margaret PurdenMcGill University, Ingram School of Nursing, Montréal, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6080-3495
Martin JuneauMontreal Heart Institute Research Center and Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4599-0047
Jean-Francois TanguayMontreal Heart Institute Research Center and Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1057-0528
Marie-Josée SimardIntegrated Health and Social Services Centres, l'Est de l'Île de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1044-8901
Jocelyn DupuisMontreal Heart Institute Research Center and Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3193-1014
Jean G DiodatiHôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6696-6719
Jean-Francois TremblayHôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montréal, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8719-1270
Marc-André Maheu-CadotteUniversité de Montréal, Faculty of Nursing, Montréal, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3190-0901
Daniel CournoyerMontreal Health Innovations Coordinating Center, Montréal, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6271-1607

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the health benefits of increasing physical activity in the secondary prevention of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), up to 60% of ACS patients are insufficiently active. Evidence supporting the effect of Web-based interventions on increasing physical activity outcomes in ACS patients is growing. However, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using Web-based technologies that measured objective physical activity outcomes are sparse.

objectiveOur aim is to evaluate in insufficiently active ACS patients, the effect of a fully automated, Web-based tailored nursing intervention (TAVIE en m@rche) on increasing steps per day.

methodsA parallel two-group multicenter RCT (target N=148) is being conducted in four major teaching hospitals in Montréal, Canada. An experimental group receiving the 4-week TAVIE en m@rche intervention plus a brief "booster" at 8 weeks, is compared with the control group receiving hyperlinks to publicly available websites. TAVIE en m@rche is based on the Strengths-Based Nursing Care orientation to nursing practice and the Self-Determination Theory of human motivation. The intervention is centered on videos of a nurse who delivers the content tailored to baseline levels of self-reported autonomous motivation, perceived competence, and walking behavior. Participants are recruited in hospital and are eligible if they report access to a computer and report less than recommended physical activity levels 6 months before hospitalization. Most outcome data are collected online at baseline, and 5 and 12 weeks postrandomization. The primary outcome is change in accelerometer-measured steps per day between randomization and 12 weeks. The secondary outcomes include change in steps per day between randomization and 5 weeks, and change in self-reported energy expenditure for walking and moderate to vigorous physical activity between randomization, and 5 and 12 weeks. Theoretical outcomes are the mediating role of self-reported perceived autonomy support, autonomous and controlled motivations, perceived competence, and barrier self-efficacy on steps per day. Clinical outcomes are quality of life, smoking, medication adherence, secondary prevention program attendance, health care utilization, and angina frequency. The potential moderating role of sex will also be explored. Analysis of covariance models will be used with covariates such as sex, age, fatigue, and depression symptoms. Allocation sequence is concealed, and blinding will be implemented during data analysis.

resultsRecruitment started March 30, 2016. Data analysis is planned for November 2017.

conclusionsFinding alternative interventions aimed at increasing the adoption of health behavior changes such as physical activity in the secondary prevention of ACS is clearly needed. Our RCT is expected to help support the potential efficacy of a fully automated, Web-based tailored nursing intervention on the objective outcome of steps per day in an ACS population. If this RCT is successful, and after its implementation as part of usual care, TAVIE en m@rche could help improve the health of ACS patients at large.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02617641; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02617641 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6pNNGndRa).

Indexed as

acute coronary syndromecomputer-tailoredeHealthInternetnursing interventionphysical activitysecondary preventionSelf-Determination TheoryStrengths-Based Nursing Carewalking

Identifiers

PMID28450272
PMCPMC5427251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.